Re: [Etherboot-developers] UNDI driver

[<ke...@us...>]

>Thanks; I see the option (--relocseg=0x8000) on the man page.  I'm not 
>familiar with first32.c; are there any implications for using a different 
>load address and is there any reason (other than the need to recompile) 
>why we can't use arbitrary load addresses in base memory?

It can run from anywhere if recompiled, but as it coexists with the
kernel, however briefly, any space it occupies cannot be used to load
the kernel in.  Personally I think that everyone should use bz kernels
and load above 1 MB these days. Then all of low memory would be freed
up.