|
From: <ebi...@ln...> - 2003-05-03 14:10:25
|
"Robb Main" <ma...@ac...> writes: > > Hmm. I think it's probably best to get to 5.2 soon and to keep the major > > hacking and portability fixes for 5.3. > > Given the bulk of changes already in 5.1 (and some of Eric's reservations - > I know he has allot invested in 5.1), I can submit my nic.c split to 5.3. I > need to get further with memtest86 before I know if I've got the split > right. If we weren't on the edge of talking about what little things need to happen before 5.2 I would be less concerned. My biggest concern is that there currently a lot of people who should be using 5.1.x but aren't because it is a development version. For example I have had the alignment problem in nic.c come up twice now when it is already fixed in 5.1.x. That and there are some drivers we can only support in 5.1. Eric |
