Re: [Etherboot-developers] tidy ups

[<ke...@us...>]

>> You sure? I thought it was legal in C now to have declarations anywhere
>> before use (oversimplifying). gcc has no complaint with this:
>
>I believe that is a C99 feature, which became available with GCC 3.0 
>(not sure about any of the 2.9.x releases): 
>http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.0/c99status.html

Hmm, I wonder if it's reasonable to require gcc 3 for Etherboot 5.1 and
later. It would cut down on the variations. Most recent distros ship
with gcc 3. I could also get rid of the -malign-* warnings and the
indirect call without * warning.