Re: [Etherboot-developers] VT6105 0x3106
Brought to you by:
marty_connor,
stefanhajnoczi
|
From: <Gee...@xs...> - 2003-02-09 21:58:59
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 02:06:01PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Gee...@xs... (Geert Stappers) writes: > > > Hello, > > > > For the development release, 5.1.5, I made also > > a patch for supporting a VIA6105 chip with PCI ID 0x3106 > > > > It is not tested, because I was not able to build a testfloppy. > > (the 5.0.8 is test due the better documation ;-) > > make bin/???.fd0 should work... For '???' I had to fill in 'via-rhineVT6105', after this patch (against CVS): Index: etherboot-5.1/src/NIC =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/etherboot/etherboot/etherboot-5.1/src/NIC,v retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.13 NIC - --- etherboot-5.1/src/NIC 8 Jan 2003 03:04:12 -0000 1.13 +++ etherboot-5.1/src/NIC 9 Feb 2003 21:32:06 -0000 @@ -155,6 +155,7 @@ # Rhine-II via-rhine-old 0x1106,0x6100 via-rhine 0x1106,0x3065 +via-rhineVT6105 0x1106,0x3106 family drivers/net/w89c840 winbond840 0x1050,0x0840 Winbond W89c840 The 5.1.6pre5 release does a clean DCHP session on the VT6105. I still didn't read the small print on Sourceforge about getting a CVS account. Could somebody else apply the patch? IMHO does the LOG-file not have te been updated. Geert Stappers -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAj5GzusACgkQ91HXn1UReY+TGACggeSgXmmGqbbgtRw2FFf22aBg Pw4An0OkFro/XgFs5/VyIToB3JpUZEOk =Yl5N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |