Re: [Etherboot-developers] Etherboot 5.1.2rc7 released
Brought to you by:
marty_connor,
stefanhajnoczi
|
From: Doug A. <amb...@am...> - 2002-10-24 03:47:56
|
Eric W. Biederman writes:
| I will check it out. At least with the FreeBSD pxe code someone
| contributed it depended on headers that are only present on FreeBSD.
| And that code at least is broken in 5.1.x
I guess the should be looked at. I know when I added the FreeBSD support
back in (the original code came from FreeBSD) I made that support not
depend on FreeBSD headers.
| It is nice to know that FreeBSD still works with etherboot. It would
| be nice if etherboot did not need FreeBSD specific code but that is
Well I like that I don't have to run a "munger" on the FreeBSD kernel
to boot it. I use menus to boot different versions etc. nbgrub for
example can take a raw bzImage and boot Linux. It also can
take a raw {Free,Open,Net}BSD kernels. So I just have sym-links
into those trees. Then when I netboot them I just do a make depend &&
make && make install && reboot and then boot the new kernel.
I also like the PXE environment for DOS a little better since
I can just run mtools on the image that PXE downloads. I've had
some issues with mknbi not working with some DOS programs but
the PXE stuff just worked. I think it was PC Doctor (a PC diags
program) that blew up.
The biggest thing I like about Etherboot is that all the source is
there so I can add code to drive special hardware and select
manufacturing or normal boot modes and then stick that into
a system BIOS and build a customized psuedo firmware especially
when I don't have source the the system BIOS. Even then building the
system BIOS can be a pain if you require DOS or OS/2 to build it.
Etherboot can easily be built. I am starting to migrate some things
to PXE using the PXE patches for isc-dhcp. The biggest draw back is that
PC stuff uses the VGA/kernel for the console.
| another issue. Do you know if there is any interest in running
| FreeBSD under LinuxBIOS?
Probably. We might use it in our product assuming is supported our
chipset. Having a BIOS that worked through the serial port and have
not worry about CMOS setting would be a good thing. We use the
i845E chipset in our next generation hardware.
Doug A.
|