On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 01:38:25AM +1000, Ken Yap wrote:
> >I don't think you understand what I was trying to do. I figured it
> >was better to make a special real-mode stack for calling interrupts
> >than to fuss with the protected-mode stack. This has nothing to do
> >with the way that the loaders was called--I read ifdef's just fine.
>
> This would have been the better solution, and is in fact what Eric has
> implemented in 5.1.2+ by rewriting all the BIOS stub routines, which
> frees Etherboot to live anywhere.
Cool.
> Those BIOS stubs with inline mode switching go all the way back to the
> roots of Etherboot in BSD Netboot. Evidently it was the easy thing to do
> then. But Etherboot has outgrown that straitjacket now, thanks to Eric.
Is this new code working? Or, should I stick with a patched mknbi?
|