|
From: <ke...@us...> - 2002-08-24 00:05:53
|
>> Your code runs in 0.1s on a 1MB vmlinuz file on my system (350MHz K6-2). >> Congratulations. > >Nice. Then I won't worry about the code to much. I should add that the 0.1s included the time to read in the file and mknbi has to do this anyway. >Nice. Do you know if the substr hurts? I guess at 0.1s it isn't too >bad. Last time I was messing with the code and I complained checksums >in perl were terribly slow, you speculated that the problem was that I >was using substr. And it has taken me a long time to think of a >substitute. I don't see any other reasonable way to do it. You're only calling it as many times as there are 64k chunks so it's not a significant overhead I think. |
