Re: [Etherboot-developers] Patch for TFTP-multicast released
Brought to you by:
marty_connor,
stefanhajnoczi
|
From: <ke...@us...> - 2002-07-03 21:35:25
|
>I got the lastest sources and made up a diff file against them - I'm not sure >if all that stuff compiles, or if it breaks anything for you, but apply that >patch to the sources in etherboot 5.1 -not forgetting the backup option of >"patch" - and copy proto_tftm.c to that dir, so you get the following new >possibilities in "Config": > >-DURI_SUPPORT > you will need this anyway >-DURI_SUPPORT_FILE > so you can use filenames like "file:/disk/0" and so on. >-DURI_SUPPORT_TFTP > so "tftp:///filename" will be recognised. >-DURI_SUPPORT_NFS > as well >-DURI_SUPPORT_SLAM > so "x-slam://" URIs are recognised. Ask Eric how far his slam code wen >t, you > probably want to set -DDOWNLOAD_PROTO_SLAM too. >-DURI_SUPPORT_TFTM > so "x-tftm://server-ip/filename" can be recognised. You will also have > to > set the -DDOWNLOAD_PROTO_TFTM option for this to work. Please rework it so that only URI_SUPPORT needs to be defined and then it implies URI_SUPPORT_XXX depending on whether DOWNLOAD_PROTO_XXX has been defined. I don't want 5 additional options when 1 will do. >These URIs can be extended to allow specification of anti-standard UDP ports >or another server's IP (no DNS [for now?], so no hostnames). For TFTM, >servername works fine (don't know if it's even required to be present !? - no >matter, bugfixing tftm will be necessary for some time) Please publish a specification of the URIs. Do you take the TFTP server from only the DHCP siaddr field? I don't want a redundant specification of a different server when they should be using next-server in dhcpd.conf if they want a different TFTP server. |