Re: [Etherboot-developers] mknbi-1.2-7rc2 released
Brought to you by:
marty_connor,
stefanhajnoczi
|
From: Christoph P. <chr...@gm...> - 2002-02-27 00:58:49
|
GRUB loads the standard build linux image (default vmlinuz !). Again, I do not want a GRUB vs. Etherboot competition ! I like both in conjunction ! Christoph P. "Eric W. Biederman" wrote: > > Christoph Plattner <chr...@gm...> writes: > > > Hello ! > > > > Sorry to say this again, but I prefer using GRUB together with > > `etherboot', and so nobody has to deal with `mknbi' in connection > > with UNIX systems (for DOS mknbi is already needed so far). > > I agree that not necesarily needing mknbi is a good thing which > is why I am working on cleaning up the linux kernel build, so > it build ELF bootable kernels. > > > GRUB can direclty load images and has currently the SAME network > > driver state as etherboot (full 5.0.5 driver compatible). > > But the images still must be built. > > > I like really both, especially both in conjunction. > > Etherboot+GRUB is one of the best BIOS "Extensions" to get a feeling > > of a full boot monitor like on SUN or HP (even better !!!!). > > And reply to me on this is definentily talking to the wrong crowd. > For the most part I figure todays BIOS's are way to complex to be > maintainable. And I don't care how far you extend a pile of rubble > you just get more rubble. > > As for GRUB I see a lot of design issues with it, and it's whole > multiboot format. I will agree for purposes of argument that > it may get experience right but that is about it. > > Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------- private: chr...@gm... company: chr...@al... |