Re: [Etherboot-developers] Building from CVS vs using rom-o-matic.net
Brought to you by:
marty_connor,
stefanhajnoczi
From: Timothy L. <tl...@ro...> - 2004-02-24 11:30:14
|
> Is there a difference between building from the CVS, and downloading > the image from www.rom-o-matic.net? Yes. The CVS is almost always more up to date. > I downloaded a www.rom-o-matic.net image (version 5.3.3, .zpxe format) > for tg3 card, with the following options set: You should not be using the 5.3 version unlesss you realize that it is a development release. > which didn't work for me. I checked out the CVS directory > (etherboot-5.3), and built bin/tg3.zpxe, with the above configured in > the Config file, which worked fine for me. Take a look at the release notes for 5.3.5-mc1 on Romomatic. The tg3 driver was fixed in 5.3.4 and 5.3.5. > I think, the CVS sources and the rom-o-matic sources might not be in > sync, in which case, I would like to know, how often do the sources > get sync'ed. It depends on how much time there is and how active the development tree is. (There is no point in posting a release that doesn't compile). Tim |