You can subscribe to this list here.
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(5) |
2010 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2011 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
From: Jason H. <jh...@ap...> - 2008-11-25 02:16:15
|
Etch 3.2 has been released Fixed bug in handling of ownership requests involving a user or group that doesn't exist on the client system. https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2317757&group_id=234501&atid=1093658 |
From: Jason H. <jh...@ap...> - 2008-11-18 22:52:35
|
Etch 3.1 has been released Primarily this release adds in the demo and sample configuration directories that were accidentally left out of the 3.0 release. It also includes a minor bugfix with the Red Hat client package. |
From: Jason H. <jh...@ap...> - 2008-11-09 10:12:53
|
Etch 3.0 has been released Relative to the 2.x series of releases 3.0 represents: - Re-architected from a client-only architecture to a client-server architecture. While the previous architecture had several things going for it (simplicity, scalability) a couple of compelling features drove the decision to re-architect: 1) Impact prediction: In large environments it becomes necessary to have automated tools that help determine the potential impact of a configuration change. The environment is too large for any single person to know how all the systems interact, the scale of the operation means that a bad change could be catastrophic, etc. With a client-only architecture there's no central location that knows the state of the client systems and can run tests to predict the impact of changes. It rapidly becomes infeasible to do test runs involving all client systems or even a representative subset. As such you need to generate the configuration centrally, and that central system can generate prospective configuration changes and compare them to the current configuration to assist in impact prediction and risk management. 2) Compartmentalization: The client-only architecture required transmitting the complete configuration repository to all clients. Although this is fine for many environments there are some cases where you don't want all clients seeing the configuration of all other systems. With the client-server architecture only the server has access to the complete repository, individual clients are only given their specific configuration. - Complete rewrite from Perl to Ruby. The server uses the Ruby on Rails framework so it shares a similar design and deployment model with nVentory, an Open Source asset management and operations database that works well with etch. http://sourceforge.net/projects/ nventory/ Some relevant links: http://etch.wiki.sourceforge.net/ http://etch.wiki.sourceforge.net/ConvertingFromEtch2ToEtch3 https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=234501 |