Menu

#44 Espeak + Mbrola: easier usage under Linux

v1.0 (example)
closed-fixed
None
5
2013-12-20
2009-05-22
Anonymous
No

I really like the Espeak+mbrola thing, but I think Linux users are kind of penalised because of the way mbrola is used.
To use a mbrola voice with eSpeak a linux user has to pipe it to mbrola itself, while a Windows user can find the voice from the Speech synthesis voice in control panel.

I know that there is no mbrola.so file and thus it is necessary to use the mbrola binary, but what about an option (--mbrola?) which tells eSpeak to look for the mbrola binary in $PATH?
Or just a config file in which eSpeak can look when it has to use a mbrola voice?

Simone R.

Discussion

  • Jonathan Duddington

    This is a feature request rather than a bug.

    The problem is not the location of the mbrola binary or mbrola data. The problem is that on Linux mbrola does not provide a library-function interface for eSpeak to use.

    In order to call mbrola from within eSpeak, eSpeak will need to create a pipe to and from the mbrola binary in order to send phoneme data and receive audio data. I tried to do this, but it got complicated. A better solution would be for mbrola to provide a library-function interface as it does on Windows.

    To reduce the amount of typing, you could make a short shell-script to call eSpeak with mbrola.

     
  • Jonathan Duddington

    • assigned_to: nobody --> jonsd
     
  • Jonathan Duddington

    This is fixed in current version. On Linux,
    espeak -v mb-en1 "Hello world"

    should speak without the need for pipes. The mbrola voice file should be in
    espeak-data/mbrola/en
    /usr/share/mbrola/en
    /usr/share/mbrola/en/en

    (This last path was added in eSpeak version 1.45).

     
  • Jonathan Duddington

    • status: open --> open-fixed
     
  • Jonathan Duddington

    • status: open-fixed --> closed-fixed
    • Group: --> v1.0 (example)
     

Log in to post a comment.