[ES40-developers] SCSI support for OpenVMS has arrived
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
iamcamiel
From: Camiel V. <iam...@gm...> - 2008-02-16 13:19:56
|
Hi Again, I haven't been able to get my hands on a KZPCA yet, (some of you had suggestions who to ask, I'm pursuing those leads now) but in the meantime, I took a good look at the KZPAA card I do have. It's a 53C810-based card, which is fairly similar to the 53C895. The good news is that this card does not have any firmware. Due to the similarities with the 53C895 it turned out to be not that hard to come up with a working emulation. I just successfully booted OpenVMS off an emulated SCSI disk. I've committed the new code to the CVS repository. It will also be in the next release. You'll need to change your config file, replace 53c895 with 53c810, and all scsi-disks should be in the 0.0 - 0.6 range (sorry, no wide scsi on this card). Camiel. On Feb 15, 2008 11:54 AM, Camiel Vanderhoeven <iam...@gm...> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > First, a piece of good news: Eduardo Marcello Serrat has found the > cause of the bugcheck in the SCSI driver. That means we're getting > closer to working SCSI disks on the emulator running OpenVMS. > > Now the bad news, to complete the emulation of the SCSI card, we need > an image of the firmware ROM on a true DEC 3X-KZPCA-AA SCSI > controller. > > If I could get my hands on a real 3X-KZPCA-AA card, I could probably > manage to extract the contents of the ROM to create an image. > > If any of you happen to have one of these cards, could you let me > know? They are identifyable by the main chip, which is either "NCR > 53C985", "LSI Logic 53C895" or "Symbios 53C895". There are also > versions of this card that won't work with OpenVMS, so please check > that first. If you have this card, it would be very useful if you > could create an image of the PCI option ROM, or if you'd be willing to > part with the card (for a while) so I can extract the image. > > Thanks, > > Camiel. > > P.S. Apologies to those who receive this e-mail twice, but I found > this important enough to send to both the developers and the > announcements list. > |