From: Toby T. <to...@sm...> - 2007-04-24 11:46:41
|
On 24-Apr-07, at 3:24 AM, Stefan Scholl wrote: > Claes Wikstrom <kl...@ta...> wrote: >> ju...@pr... wrote: >>> I'm extremely underwhelmed with Apache style configuration files >>> that >>> appear to be loosely based on XML but quite clearly are not valid >>> XML. >> >> I completely agree, config file should be proper XML > > I disagree, unless the config file is written by a tool. In the > Unix world most config files are edited with a text editor. XML > is messy. > > Reading XML is OK when you want to debug some XML based protocol, > but for config files it's a bad choice. Agree, if said files are to be written by humans. > > > ejabberd uses Erlang terms, which is also a bad choice, because > the target groups aren't Erlang programmers. For yaws this could > be OK. Or maybe something like the INI files from the Windows > world. Apache's syntax is already far more expressive than INI. --Toby > > > -- > Web (en): http://www.no-spoon.de/ -*- Web (de): http://www.frell.de/ > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > Erlyaws-list mailing list > Erl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/erlyaws-list |