Thread: [Erlangweb-users] Displaying dates
Brought to you by:
etcerlangweb,
paulgray
|
From: Graeme D. <gra...@gm...> - 2010-03-20 03:38:04
|
Hi,
I am sure everyone else is displaying dates fine, so it must be me,
but I have tried all the combinations i can think of.
The data in my database looks good (as io:format-ed after reading) but
displays as an integer.
My _types record contains this:
dob = {date,[{format, "YYYY-MM-DD"},
{description, "Date of Birth"}]}
and my html looks thusly:
<p>date of birth: <wpart:lookup key="player:dob" format="date" /></p>
but the display is just a number :
date of birth: 61661174400
i.e. the date in seconds.
What am i doing wrong?
Thanks,
graeme
|
|
From: Graeme D. <gra...@gm...> - 2010-03-20 08:25:37
|
On 20 March 2010 15:07, alexander barakin <ale...@gm...> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 06:37, Graeme Defty <gra...@gm...> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am sure everyone else is displaying dates fine, so it must be me,
>> but I have tried all the combinations i can think of.
>>
>> The data in my database looks good (as io:format-ed after reading) but
>> displays as an integer.
>>
>> My _types record contains this:
>>
>> dob = {date,[{format, "YYYY-MM-DD"},
>> {description, "Date of Birth"}]}
>>
>> and my html looks thusly:
>>
>> <p>date of birth: <wpart:lookup key="player:dob" format="date" /></p>
>>
>> but the display is just a number :
>>
>> date of birth: 61661174400
>>
>> i.e. the date in seconds.
>
> because 61661174400 is in far future? (:
> $ date -d @61661174400
> Thu Dec 20 03:00:00 MSK 3923
>
> --
> wbr, alexander barakin aka sash-kan.
>
I don't think so.
61661174400 is 1953-12-17 in seconds.
1953-12-17 is what i put in the database and what i see read out of it
again, as I mentioned.
g
|
|
From: alexander b. <ale...@gm...> - 2010-03-20 09:24:31
|
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 11:25, Graeme Defty <gra...@gm...> wrote:
> On 20 March 2010 15:07, alexander barakin <ale...@gm...> wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 06:37, Graeme Defty <gra...@gm...> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am sure everyone else is displaying dates fine, so it must be me,
>>> but I have tried all the combinations i can think of.
>>>
>>> The data in my database looks good (as io:format-ed after reading) but
>>> displays as an integer.
>>>
>>> My _types record contains this:
>>>
>>> dob = {date,[{format, "YYYY-MM-DD"},
>>> {description, "Date of Birth"}]}
>>>
>>> and my html looks thusly:
>>>
>>> <p>date of birth: <wpart:lookup key="player:dob" format="date" /></p>
>>>
>>> but the display is just a number :
>>>
>>> date of birth: 61661174400
>>>
>>> i.e. the date in seconds.
>>
>> because 61661174400 is in far future? (:
>> $ date -d @61661174400
>> Thu Dec 20 03:00:00 MSK 3923
>>
>> --
>> wbr, alexander barakin aka sash-kan.
>>
>
> I don't think so.
>
> 61661174400 is 1953-12-17 in seconds.
>
> 1953-12-17 is what i put in the database and what i see read out of it
> again, as I mentioned.
1953 — date before unix epoch, which starts at 1970-01-01:
$ date -d '1953-12-17' +'%s'
-506228400
--
wbr, alexander barakin aka sash-kan.
|
|
From: Graeme D. <gra...@gm...> - 2010-03-21 01:24:48
|
On 20 March 2010 16:24, alexander barakin <ale...@gm...> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 11:25, Graeme Defty <gra...@gm...> wrote:
>> On 20 March 2010 15:07, alexander barakin <ale...@gm...> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 06:37, Graeme Defty <gra...@gm...> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I am sure everyone else is displaying dates fine, so it must be me,
>>>> but I have tried all the combinations i can think of.
>>>>
>>>> The data in my database looks good (as io:format-ed after reading) but
>>>> displays as an integer.
>>>>
>>>> My _types record contains this:
>>>>
>>>> dob = {date,[{format, "YYYY-MM-DD"},
>>>> {description, "Date of Birth"}]}
>>>>
>>>> and my html looks thusly:
>>>>
>>>> <p>date of birth: <wpart:lookup key="player:dob" format="date" /></p>
>>>>
>>>> but the display is just a number :
>>>>
>>>> date of birth: 61661174400
>>>>
>>>> i.e. the date in seconds.
>>>
>>> because 61661174400 is in far future? (:
>>> $ date -d @61661174400
>>> Thu Dec 20 03:00:00 MSK 3923
>>>
>>> --
>>> wbr, alexander barakin aka sash-kan.
>>>
>>
>> I don't think so.
>>
>> 61661174400 is 1953-12-17 in seconds.
>>
>> 1953-12-17 is what i put in the database and what i see read out of it
>> again, as I mentioned.
>
> 1953 — date before unix epoch, which starts at 1970-01-01:
> $ date -d '1953-12-17' +'%s'
> -506228400
>
> --
> wbr, alexander barakin aka sash-kan.
>
Erlang does not store dates in Unix format, but in a tuple of
{YYYY,MM,DD}. Unix epoch is irelevant.
In any case, even non-erlang programs are capable of displaying dates
before 1970.
So how is it done in ErlangWeb?
|
|
From: Magnus H. <ma...@er...> - 2010-03-22 12:31:41
|
Graeme Defty <gra...@gm...> writes:
> My _types record contains this:
>
> dob = {date,[{format, "YYYY-MM-DD"},
> {description, "Date of Birth"}]}
>
> and my html looks thusly:
>
> <p>date of birth: <wpart:lookup key="player:dob" format="date" /></p>
These two places have no connection with eachother; the wpart:lookup
can't get the format from your wtype. Try something like:
<wpart:lookup key="player:dob" format="date(YYYY-MM-DD)" />
--
Magnus Henoch, ma...@er...
Erlang Solutions
http://www.erlang-solutions.com/
---------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
WE'VE CHANGED NAMES!
Since January 1st 2010 Erlang Training and Consulting Ltd. has become ERLANG SOLUTIONS LTD.
www.erlang-solutions.com
|