From: Adrian A. <ad...@us...> - 2005-04-02 19:55:22
|
tc...@fr... (Tobias C. Rittweiler) writes: > Adrian Aichner <ad...@xe...> writes: > >> tc...@fr... (Tobias C. Rittweiler) writes: >> >> > Adrian Aichner <ad...@xe...> writes: >> > >> > > Making erc depend on gnus would be a pretty bad idea, IMO. >> > > >> > > Not that XEmacs packages don't have interdependencies, but this >> > > one seems like a bit of a strech. >> > >> > Of course. But be aware that I haven't spoken about a eat-or-die >> > dependency. (In fact, I understand `netrc.el' as being there for >> > deploying it with your own code base for the case that Gnus ain't >> > installed.) >> >> Ah, and netrc.el is in the mail-lib XEmacs package, not in gnus. I >> just checked. > > As well as in in GNU Emacs (22.0.50 at least); there it's in > net/netrc.el. Does that relativise your complain? :-) Yes, it does -- not that I have any say here :-) Are you thinking of optional functionality based on (featurep 'netrc) test? Using an ftp configuration file for erc seems a bit abusive, though. > > > --tcr. > > > -- Adrian Aichner mailto:ad...@us... http://xemacs.sourceforge.net/ |