Re: [Erc-help] ERC CTCP handlers.

[Alex S. <al...@em...>]

Mario Lang <ml...@de...> writes:

> I think it should at least allow for a FORMAT-STRING to be a conscell and be used
> for a BODY to be useful.

We could use (command &rest args)

where ARGS is either a SIMPLE-ANSWER or a BODY.
A SIMPLE-ANSWER has the form FORMAT-STRING &rest FORMAT-ARGS.
The only requirement for BODY is that it may not start with a string.

How about that?

> On the other hand, if someone wants to work on ctcp, I think it
> would be much more desireable to split CTCP out of erc.el into
> erc-ctcp.el.  This would be `require'ed at almost all times, but it
> would be great to have CTCP in one place, especially since it is
> just an extention to IRC.

Sure, splitting erc.el is always a good idea.

Alex.
-- 
http://www.emacswiki.org/alex/
There is no substitute for experience.