Re: [Erc-help] ERC internalisation

[Xavier M. <ze...@gn...>]

Mario Lang <ml...@de...> writes:

>  Xavier Maillard <ze...@gn...> writes:
>=20=20
> > > >  I just wonder wether there were advancements on this point
> > > >  through catalog.
> > > >=20=20
> > > >  I have already done some effort to translate strings to french
> > > >  but AFAIC, I don't really see real progress on this point.
> > > >=20=20
> > > >  It is still a pain to have ERC talks in other thing but
> > > >  english.
> > > >=20=20
> > > >  May someone reports me where I should look ?
> > >  I dont unerstand what you are asking for.
> >=20=20
> >  Some times ago, someone (maybe you) introduced the zenirc catalog
> >  stuff for ERC.
>  Yes, that was actually me, during the massive rewrite phase.
>=20=20
> >  I can imagine that if it was added in ERC, someone got interests in
> >  having it and so having more translations, no ?
>  Sure we are interested in translations, it is just that so far, no
>  one has submitted anything.  As already said, I'd be happy to include
>  such stuff if it were available.

Ok.
=20
> > >  You will have to find willing translators to get this done.
> > >  I, for my part, do not see any real use in german messages,
> > >  so I did not work on a translation...
> >=20=20
> >  I personnaly do not see interest in having french messages, but as
> >  I did the translation, I would appreciate if I could try it without
> >  a pain.
>  So, what are your pains?  Is your french translation suitable/ready
>  for submission?

Hmm. What I mean is that the french translation I made is quite good
and ready (for the basics) but I have problems to tell ERC to use it by
default. I must kludge to have it started and this is why I say it is
pain to have french. This is why I don't have french by default too :)

zeDek
=2D-=20
Microsoft isn't the answer. Microsoft is the question, and the answer is NO.