Menu

#99 Allow <restore>

future
done
nobody
None
5(medium)
2019-01-22
2015-10-16
No

The <restore> tag is useful for indicating that a deletion has been removed; see the thread at http://lsv.uky.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind1501&L=MARKUP&P=R346&I=-3.

Discussion

  • BODARD Gabriel

    BODARD Gabriel - 2015-12-08
    • status: unread --> deferred
     
  • BODARD Gabriel

    BODARD Gabriel - 2015-12-08

    Subsumed into discussion of [FR 96] for now. Reopen if needs to be revisited.

     
  • Hugh A. Cayless

    Hugh A. Cayless - 2017-01-17

    The solution to [#119] should resolve this (though not add it to EpiDoc).

     

    Related

    Request Features: #119

  • Hugh A. Cayless

    Hugh A. Cayless - 2019-01-22

    We think this is resolved because EpiDoc now publishes our compiled ODD, allowing for chaining. I can explain how to do it (DLL does this), and there is a tutorial here: http://teic.github.io/TCW/howtoChain.html

     
  • Hugh A. Cayless

    Hugh A. Cayless - 2019-01-22
    • status: deferred --> done
     
  • Andrew Dunning

    Andrew Dunning - 2019-01-22

    Interesting – thanks! I would be interested to know if <restore> simply isn't applicable to epigraphy, or if the tag itself is simply too weird; I have been tending to add another <subst> layer to work around its absence in the meantime (a rare occurrence).

     

Log in to post a comment.