We think this is resolved because EpiDoc now publishes our compiled ODD, allowing for chaining. I can explain how to do it (DLL does this), and there is a tutorial here: http://teic.github.io/TCW/howtoChain.html
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Interesting – thanks! I would be interested to know if <restore> simply isn't applicable to epigraphy, or if the tag itself is simply too weird; I have been tending to add another <subst> layer to work around its absence in the meantime (a rare occurrence).
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Subsumed into discussion of [FR 96] for now. Reopen if needs to be revisited.
The solution to [#119] should resolve this (though not add it to EpiDoc).
Related
Request Features:
#119We think this is resolved because EpiDoc now publishes our compiled ODD, allowing for chaining. I can explain how to do it (DLL does this), and there is a tutorial here: http://teic.github.io/TCW/howtoChain.html
Interesting – thanks! I would be interested to know if
<restore>
simply isn't applicable to epigraphy, or if the tag itself is simply too weird; I have been tending to add another<subst>
layer to work around its absence in the meantime (a rare occurrence).