Menu

#95 Give examples of @type on persName

9.6
accepted
None
5(medium)
2023-06-15
2015-05-20
No

more details requested for the use of @type in http://www.stoa.org/epidoc/gl/latest/idx-persnames.html

Discussion

  • BODARD Gabriel

    BODARD Gabriel - 2015-12-08

    The question was raised as to whether EpiDoc should be recommending "London" usage for persName and name--consensus is yes. We should revisit the guidelines to make it much more detailed and explicit. Suggestions are good because they help to encourage consistency (indexing in EFES will be more straightforward, for example); suggestions are also not obligatory, and more or less detail are both possible in individual cases. Further examples of Roman, Greek, Celtic and other types of names would all be useful.

    (Linking to SNAP worth a mention?)

     
  • BODARD Gabriel

    BODARD Gabriel - 2015-12-08
    • status: unread --> accepted
    • assigned_to: BODARD Gabriel
    • Priority: 3 --> 5(medium)
     
  • Pietro Maria Liuzzo

    An example from Vernacular inscriptions project. They simply choose that there is no reason to distinguish at the moment and add @type. They simply mark names and persName and index those.

    <persName><name>Branca</name> <name><w>d’</w><supplied reason="lost">Ur</supplied>so</name></persName>
    
     
  • BODARD Gabriel

    BODARD Gabriel - 2016-09-20
    • Group: future --> 8.23
     
  • Simona Stoyanova

    • assigned_to: BODARD Gabriel --> Simona Stoyanova
     
  • BODARD Gabriel

    BODARD Gabriel - 2016-11-16
    • summary: persName --> Give examples of @type on persName
     
  • Simona Stoyanova

    The London usage of @type includes the values: attested, emperor, divine, consular, ruler, other; the distinction between 'ruler' and 'consular' being that we normally tag any local ruler/king mentioned in the text in any capacity as @type="ruler", and 'consular' is used only for consuls/archons/priests who are mentioned as part of the dating formula. It all depends on how we want to index the mentioned people and what we unltimatley want to do with them but that has been the categorisation used so far.

    Now, 'consular' doesn't really apply to anything outside of Roman context, so Scott suggested changing it to 'eponymous'. (Also, it looks like only IRCyr uses it. IAph and IRT don't.)

    Another option is to approach the concept differently, not as a type of person or of their name but as a person's role. So then we might have a reccommended list of values for @role instead of @type, which seems more rational for what these words signify in terms of their role in the text. For example:
    @role=attestation
    @role=political
    @role=dating
    @role=religious ("cult"?)
    ...

    Thoughts?

     
    • Simona Stoyanova

      Gabby to write to Markup list with some history of past decisions and add current proposition.

       
  • Simona Stoyanova

    • status: accepted --> pending
    • assigned_to: Simona Stoyanova --> BODARD Gabriel
    • Group: 8.23 --> future
     
  • BODARD Gabriel

    BODARD Gabriel - 2017-03-21
    • Group: future --> 8.24
     
  • BODARD Gabriel

    BODARD Gabriel - 2017-10-17
    • Group: 8.24 --> 9.0
     
  • BODARD Gabriel

    BODARD Gabriel - 2017-12-04
    • status: pending --> accepted
    • Group: 9.0 --> future
     
  • BODARD Gabriel

    BODARD Gabriel - 2018-04-17

    Gabby will write to the Markup list summarising the London/USEP usage of persName and name, and ask if anyone objects to that becoming EpiDoc recommendation.

     
  • BODARD Gabriel

    BODARD Gabriel - 2019-01-22
    • Group: future --> 9.1
     
  • BODARD Gabriel

    BODARD Gabriel - 2019-10-15
    • Group: 9.1 --> future
     
  • BODARD Gabriel

    BODARD Gabriel - 2019-10-15

    Postponed until discussion on Markup.

     
  • BODARD Gabriel

    BODARD Gabriel - 2020-01-27

    Discussion on Markup kicked off with an email at https://lsv.uky.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=MARKUP;9e906fd3.2001

    Will report back if there is any useful consensus, and/or volunteers to help write the Guidelines.

     
  • BODARD Gabriel

    BODARD Gabriel - 2020-06-16

    No objections. Gabby will implement in Guidelines.

     
  • BODARD Gabriel

    BODARD Gabriel - 2020-08-07
    • Group: future --> 9.2
     
  • BODARD Gabriel

    BODARD Gabriel - 2020-08-07

    I intend to implement this in time for the next release. Assigning to milestone accordingly.

     
  • Scott Vanderbilt

    • Group: 9.2 --> future
     
  • BODARD Gabriel

    BODARD Gabriel - 2022-01-18
    • Group: future --> 9.4
     
  • BODARD Gabriel

    BODARD Gabriel - 2023-06-15
    • Group: 9.4 --> 9.6
     

Log in to post a comment.

Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.