The EpiDoc customization of <unclear>
, which may only contain character data and <g>
(since it closely reflects Leiden underdot), is a very tight subset of the semantics of tei:unclear
, and therefore ought to be clearly documented as such, both in the Guidelines and the ODD.
EDAG agrees EpiDoc's use of
<unclear>
makes sense and agrees it should be more explicitly documented.<unclear>
doesn't map perfectly to epigraphic practice in the use of underdot, but our use of the element is unambiguous.Added further explanatory prose to trans-ambiguous.xml on the default TEI usage of <unclear>, and emphasised EpiDoc's restricted usage. Also added prose on optional attribute. Not yet added further details to ODD.
Now added description to ODD.
This is now ready for review.
This all looks fine to EDAG. Closing ticket as done for release 9.0.
Made slight tweaks, including removing the allowable TEI elements for clarity, as discussed at the Feb. 20 EDAG meeting, with commit r2721.