#99 CHET-C individual-word queries in supplement

[Tom Elliott]

for a text such as:

[Praese<n>ticius (?) pristinarius (?)]

chetc produces:

<supplied reason="lost"> Praese<supplied
reason="omitted">n</supplied>ticius<gap
reason="illegible" extent="1" unit="character"/>
pristinarius<gap reason="illegible" extent="1"
unit="character"/></supplied>

The one-character-width gaps are inappropriate.

Recommendations:

• fix chetc to support
• add to examples in guidelines at supplementforlost.xml
• verify that xslts do something sensible with the xml result

[BODARD Gabriel]

recommended markup would be
<supplied reason="lost" cert="low"> for each individual word.

This needs to be documented in guidelines, but then XSLT will (Should) handle it correctly.

[Tom Elliott]

needs check verification across schema, guidelines, xslt

[Tom Elliott]

• Description has changed:

Diff:

--- old
+++ new
@@ -10,10 +10,10 @@
 pristinarius<gap reason="illegible" extent="1"
 unit="character"/></supplied>

-The one-character-width gaps are inappropiate.
+The one-character-width gaps are inappropriate.

-REcommendations:
-\* fix chetc to support
-\* add to examples in guidelines at supplementforlost.xml 
-\* verify that xslts do something sensible with the xml
-result
+Recommendations:
+

+ * fix chetc to support
+ * add to examples in guidelines at supplementforlost.xml 
+ * verify that xslts do something sensible with the xml result

[BODARD Gabriel]

Looks to me like this is something that was fixed in the IDP version of CHET-C+XSLT written by Raffaele and Zaneta. Hard to fix in regex alone.

My instinct is to mark this ticket as obsolete, and assume it will be folded into the bigger question of what is the status of CHET-C now, can IDP CHET-C/XSL be incorporated into the public version, etc.

[Tom Elliott]

I propose closing "won't fix".