From: <dav...@di...> - 2013-05-29 22:35:01
|
"If so, when is David free to merge?" Do you mean Michael? If we're looking to do a release soon and we'd like to keep the Java and C++ interfaces close (both of which I think we do) then neither the new conversion API or new array API should go into the 4.3 release. The current code is relatively stable and has been used continuously in a good state for a while and should form a good basis for a release. Michael's changes are a significant refactor. I think we'd want some time between the merge and the next release to iron out the bugs. Everything suggests to me waiting until after the release to so the merge. I don't think exampleCPP needs bringing up to date, but there are a couple of minor fixes I'd like to put in (but exampleCPP isn't part of the release is it?). Note pvaSrv still has a dependency on pvIOCCPP so that has to be part of the release unless we change this. Dave. ________________________________________ From: White, Greg [gr...@sl...] Sent: 29 May 2013 23:03 To: epi...@li... Developers Subject: Agenda for Weekly Telecon, 30-May-2013 Colleagues, Please find enclosed the agenda for our weekly working group telecon. This meeting will be at UTC (GMT) Thursday, 15:30. See [1] for local times. Cheers Greg, for Bob and Greg 0. Preliminaries (5 mins) New meeting time. Sorry, but I have to address this again. 1. Test Framework status, (Ralph, Andrew) (5 mins) Do we have agreement on how EPICS Base test can be used for EPICS V4? 2. Status of 4.3 beta release (Matej, Ralph, Andrew, Greg, David) (20 mins) * pvaSrv * ca provider * vxWorks (has email been sent to decide on which versions to support going forward?) * status of getting started changes and other web page changes. * clients/apps need to be converted? Do David and I have to change Example* repos? 3. General Purpose Data Carrying N-type (Bob) (20 mins) 4. New Convert plans (Michael, David) (10 mins) * Has David looked at it to see what impact it has on the Java implementation. - What recommendations for changes to C++ / Java. I don't want the Java bulldozed. Implementations must be symmetrical as much as possible. * If so, when is David free to merge? If not, is he free to merge anyway. * Will this new Convert go into 4.3? [1] http://epics-pvdata.sourceforge.net/home.html#usefulinfo ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost. Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1 -- This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail. Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd. Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message. Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom |