From: Matej S. <mat...@co...> - 2011-04-17 21:08:40
|
> > > In the interest of making a decision I would go with shared_pointer over > sharedPointer, but am open to something shorter (const_shared_pointer > will wear out my fingers). > > I'll wait until tomorrow before changing this. > I have one MAJOR commit to do. I've changed pvAccessCPP-md to heavily used shared_ptr-s. I've tried to commit but I have not permissions on pvAccessCPP-md. Can I do this, Michael? I would like to commit/push on -md not to break pvServiceCPP, pvIOCCPP, After this we can agree on new pvAccess.h. Until now I've used "pointer" name. I can quickly do a file replace... to shared_pointer (and co.). OK? Matej |