Re: [Envolution-devel] Ap please re-think a litle

[<s.k...@pr...>]

Hi Eric,
and now we are back to the beginning of our discussion from monday (or
sunday, I don't know).
[...]
> The decision to follow the original roadmap is a decision I am sticking by
> and will not change unless a better solution is provided during one of the
> meetings. This roadmap and vision has been on the envolution website from
> day one until now and as far as I am aware it has never been changed. I do
> not understand why you are having such a big problem with this. This was
the
> outline agreed upon by the entire community when the Envolution project
> began, not something I made up by myself.
[...]
You can't take the old roadmap and plans from year 2002. It is definetly out
of date.
But this seems to me, that this would be your basis to start this project
new, in this strictly way without talking with the new staff you don't know.
And remember: The new people who entered eNvolution after you take a rest,
do not know you also.
Ok. We have a meeting at this weekend now.
But you publish an article with all these things BEFORE we all get the
possibility to react.
Thus you also do not need to be surprised at all the comments.

And now you start same thing again. Why?
And don't talk about:
"I'm nevertheless Co-Founder !" "I'm nevertheless Project-Manager !" "I can
do that !"

We are a open community and everybody who use eNvolution for his needs is
part of it.

Ok. It would be better been to delete the old roadmap. But we had other
things to do, with a higher priority. And as you can see, that eNvo 1.2.5
FLS has nothing to do with the system eNvo 1.0 where you are Co-Founder of.

So let it be to post such mails again on this list.

Scott and you talk about here and elsewhere we have to wait and meet us all
together in chat at weekend.
Why does not make it yourself also in such a way?

[...]
> Also, I have never said anything about throwing away all the work you and
> the development team of the last 6+ months. We will be keeping all of the
> new features that everyone has worked very hard on during that time. I do
> not understand where you got this idea from.
[...]
You can't take the old roadmap and rollback the eNvo-project to defined
starting point to bring up the ship onto the course of this roadmap without
throwing away some parts we have done last 6 months.
This again-speaks itself.

And again: More productive would be to wait for the discussions on chat and
the results of it.


Good luck,
Stefan aka WindMeUp