Menu
▾
▴
Re: Rif: Re: Antw: [Envolution-devel] postWrap
|
From: TiMax <ma...@em...> - 2003-06-05 07:04:00
|
http://www.envolution.it/modules.php?op=3Dmodload&name=3DDownloads&fi= le=3Dindex&req=3Dgetit&lid=3D185 On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 08:20:02 +0200, Luc...@cs... wrote: > > can you send me an url? > L > > > |---------+--------------------------------------------> > | | TiMax - Envolution | > | | <web...@en...> | > | | Inviato da: | > | | env...@li...ur| > | | ceforge.net | > | | | > | | | > | | 06/04/2003 07:08 PM | > | | Per favore, rispondere a | > | | envolution-devel | > | | | > |---------+--------------------------------------------> > = >---------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------| > | = | > | Per: <env...@li...> = | > | Cc: = | > | Oggetto: Re: Antw: [Envolution-devel] postWrap = | > = >---------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------| > > > yes > is not easy to manage that .... and i agree with Stefan > > But why postwrap ? try to test also StaticsDocs is not same= thing but > sometimes is better > > TiMax > > On Wed, 04 Jun 2003 16:07:01 +0200, Stefan Koehler wrote: > > @luca: > > [...] We are going to use postwrap, and guess what, we'll= need to > convert it to Oracle. > > How do we usually proceed with modules not developed by the= envo > community? [...] > > > > This is a fundamental problem. Because if we want to= distribute > 3rd-party-modules including some > changes for eNvo, it is not easy to hold them up-to-date, if= there are some > updates and fixes published by > module-owner. We have to implement them manually into the= modified files. > Or we use these modules as is > (based on xxx, version 123) and develop it in future under= eNvo without the > support of the owner. > > > > [...] Do we try to get the approval of the author? can we= ask him to > accept and include the modifiers on the > source so that it colud be preserved for future releases and= bug fix? [...] > > > > This would be the better way. But it is neccessary to share= all work. > This is a two-way development: > > Owner -> eNvo, eNvo -> owner > > Possible that not all changes would be shared. > > > > [...] Can we try to pull these developers in the envo= community? [...] > > > > And this would be the best way. But not every developer= want to work > only for one community. They have > some different interests, ideas, etc. to distribute their= work. > > But if he want to develop his modules also for eNvo, it= would be > possible, that he can update his changes > on our CVS. So we can share all automatically. > > > > Try it.... ;) > > > > WindMeUp > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of= TotalView, The best > > thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread= debugging features > > you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at= www.etnus.com. > > _______________________________________________ > > Envolution-devel mailing list > > Env...@li... > > = https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/envolution-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of= TotalView, The best > thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging= features > you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at= www.etnus.com. > _______________________________________________ > Envolution-devel mailing list > Env...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/envolution-devel |
