Re: [Envolution-devel] org. questions... talk with me

[Sjahrazad A. <sja...@ba...>]

On Sat, 24 May 2003 01:17:30 +0200, Stefan K=F6hler wrote
> [...]
> But I think also OpenSource-projects with the dimension of eNvo=20
> needs a bit same strictly and hirarchical structure as a commercial=20
> project. Not all and not with same restrictions. But without any=20
> rules, everybody can do what he want, and maybe two devs works on=20
> same things at same time (but without knowing them). This is=20
> dangerously and unexceptable. Remember what happend with PN-devel-
> team last year.[...]

Yes, you're right, it needs managers to organize the groups task and keep=
=20
the committed rules.

However, in commercial hierarchy, you have the power, superior, to enforc=
e=20
the task list. In opensource you don't have it. It only depend on how we=20
respect each other. So it needs more personal approach rather than formal=
=20
ways.

About PN, yes, why they don't create two branches, one pn-bl and pn-
encompass :) There will be no fork, because both concept has its own=20
strength points and qualified developers. Such as Windows95 and Win-NT4.0=
 :)

> [...]
> Good idea. But do you know that I am develop a module named "Todo"?=20
> [...]

I tried the module, thats great!. This is also can become an added value =
for=20
envo. Once you're ready, I hope we can use it for our intranet site.

For the current purpose I already installed the phprojekt, so we can=20
organize all issue here in intranet site. Then we can use this mailing li=
st=20
back to development purpose.

sjah