From: Martin L. <ma...@ar...> - 2003-04-14 09:01:10
|
Depends on how stable it is. Quite like the idea that the .1 increments represent releases with new features but are likely to need further testing to tease out all the bugs, whilst .2 releases are considered stable versions of the latest features and fixes releases. So 1.2.1 if we are expecting a few more bugs to emerge and 1.2.2 if we think that we are virtually bug-free. Em ----- Original Message ----- From: "TiMax - Envolution" <web...@en...> To: <env...@li...> Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 12:23 AM Subject: [Envolution-devel] envolution version Some people don't like to see " beta " in version name of envolution so how we call next package ? eNvolution 1.2 final eNvolution 1.2.1 please send your comments TiMax ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The debugger for complex code. Debugging C/C++ programs can leave you feeling lost and disoriented. TotalView can help you find your way. Available on major UNIX and Linux platforms. Try it free. www.etnus.com _______________________________________________ Envolution-devel mailing list Env...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/envolution-devel |