Re: [E-devel] Web page

[Jerome De G. <jde...@br...>]

* Esteban Salazar (esa...@cs...) wrote:
> I usually just read this list just to keep up on what is going on with
> development but I have to comment on the web page and the outcome of the
> recent formatting debate.
> 
> The only thing *really* wrong with the first draft was the mishandled
> pngs.  Someone said they didn't like the rotating E symbol but I thought
> it was cool.  Hatred for animated gifs is a hangover from the 28.8kbs days
> and this one didn't even move very fast.  Yes the tables looked a little
> pinched in explorer but WHO CARES! In mozilla/galeon and netscape it was
> formatted very nicely.
> 
> I guess whoever is doing the design needs to decide what's to be done.  My
> real point is this:  maybe the old page needed work but it was cool and
> interesting.  It looked balanced and was visually appealing.  The new page
> is ugly.

Yes, I agree and the content is... hum... missing :(

It seems e 0.17 won't be there before months (if not even years... if
ever). I then don't understand why all e 0.16 related stuffs have been
removed. Isn't it the current version of Enlightenment?  Right now we
have a window manager doesn't have a dedicated web site... Not a
good idea IMHO...

Jerome

-- 
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Jerome De Greef | jde...@li...  |  jde...@br...    |
+-----------------+          http://www.jdegreef.f2s.com            | 
                  +-------------------------------------------------+