From: Tom H. <tom...@sa...> - 2013-04-29 16:33:55
|
On 29/04/13 17:27, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote: > but we already call elm_shutdown in elm_main. If we do, we shouldn't. No? The way I see it, is that ELM_MAIN calls an init, and not a shutdown, so it generates an un-even ref without a good reason. I'm actually surprised that this doesn't break with quicklaunch that doesn't call elm_init before the main. It's a tough one to call if many people have misused the API. What do you think? -- Tom. |