From: Gustavo S. B. <bar...@pr...> - 2013-01-05 12:55:23
|
BTW, is it a leak in valgrind? Or there are still some pointers to that (possibly lost?) On Saturday, January 5, 2013, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 15:50:30 +0900 Cedric BAIL <ced...@fr...<javascript:;>> > said: > > > On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Carsten Haitzler <ra...@ra...<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 11:09:35 -0200 Lucas De Marchi > > > <luc...@pr... <javascript:;>> said: > > >> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Carsten Haitzler < > ra...@ra... <javascript:;>> > > >> wrote: > > >> > On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 01:58:49 -0200 Lucas De Marchi > > >> > <luc...@pr... <javascript:;>> said: > > >> > > > >> >> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Enlightenment SVN > > >> >> <no-...@en... <javascript:;>> wrote: > > >> >> > Log: > > >> >> > work around edbus issues by forcing the mainloop to run at least > one > > >> >> > cycle with some dummy things... in ipc launch mode. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > also make selection jump to end if a newline is there - as > disussed > > >> >> > on ml. > > >> >> > > >> >> could you detail a little bit what is the issue. Looking at the > code, > > >> >> I couldn't understand why you put all this ipc stuff, instead of > doing > > >> >> something like eve does. > > >> > > > >> > leak here: > > >> > > > >> > ==23628== 120 (64 direct, 56 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are > definitely > > >> > lost in loss record 70 of 107 > > >> > ==23628== at 0x4C29E84: calloc > > >> > (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so) ==23628== > by > > >> > 0xB48344F: edbus_connection_name_get (edbus_core.c:476) ==23628== > by > > >> > 0xB482EA8: edbus_connection_name_object_set (edbus_core.c:413) > ==23628== > > >> > by 0xB48DF6B: edbus_object_get (edbus_object.c:211) ==23628== by > > >> > 0xB484E7A: _connection_get (edbus_core.c:941) ==23628== by > 0xB484FC1: > > >> > edbus_connection_get (edbus_core.c:968) ==23628== by 0x8233529: > > >> > efreet_cache_init (efreet_cache.c:129) ==23628== by 0x822433D: > > >> > efreet_init (efreet.c:78) ==23628== by 0x4F28E2F: elm_need_efreet > > >> > (elm_main.c:449) ==23628== by 0x408CCA: config_init (config.c:24) > > >> > ==23628== by 0x40DA1B: elm_main (main.c:1003) > > >> > ==23628== by 0x40E7FB: main (main.c:1322) > > >> > ==23628== > > >> > > >> we fixed this one... could you confirm it's ok now? > > > > > > yup. this one is gone... now you can look at the wonderful evas async > > > leak... i have a terminology using 6gb... :) pretty impressive if you > ask > > > me! :) > > > > Interestingly enough I don't see that bug in Terminology, but my > > Enlightenment is leaking fast and over one night it does have a crazy > > 1.5GB memory usage. I believe the issue are related. > > i enabled multi-instance and just ran rebuilds of efl on 6 different > machines... a lot of scrolling... similar test to what valgrind log i > showed > with 700m usage. > > > -- > ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- > The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ra...@ra... <javascript:;> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, > MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current > with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft > MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122912 > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enl...@li... <javascript:;> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: bar...@gm... Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 |