Re: [E-devel] R: Re: R: checking a part's type?

[Jose G. <jos...@ju...>]

   Cedric wrote:

>>  In all seriousness  if there is love for my idea I commit to implement it.
>>  If there isn't, I will be more than happy with Dave's solution.
>>     
>
> Their is. It will be a real win if we can just check if an Edje_Object
> really provide all the needed stuff. We could even improve it as some
> type of declaration inside the EDC like the html DOCTYPE (In case we
> want to check during theme creation). So I am definitevely for number
> 2 (A parser + compiler and welcome .edt inside Edje). It's sound
> really like a good idea to me.
>   

      Rephorm had long ago suggested further introspection abilities
for edje/edc... but no one seemed interested. I've also brought up
before that it may be a good idea to have better knowledge of what
these '.edj' files are meant to be...