From: Mike F. <va...@ge...> - 2006-10-14 05:18:03
|
in ns_wait_for_socket() it is possible to return an uninitialized "ret" if socket() returns failure ... so attached patch sets it to -1 at start ... side node, shouldnt that tmp_sock > 0 be >= 0 ? in reality it'll prob never be 0, but a value of 0 from socket() is certainly not an error ... in ns_ren_disp() it may be possible to pass an uninitialized "l" to the MALLOC() so attached patch sets it to 0 at start -mike |