From: Tom G. <to...@li...> - 2001-11-06 23:49:48
|
* Carsten Haitzler (ra...@ra...) wrote: > On Tue, 6 Nov 2001 21:42:59 +0000 Tom Gilbert <to...@li...> babbled > profusely: > > > > > But raster, we do have to fix this. We can't keep telling people to > > downgrade. It _is_ a problem with imlib2, and it does cause imlib2 to > > break with any binutils > .90.x (and there have been like 5 releases > > since then), and it's nothing to do with debian, I tried an official > > tarball. I also tried different versions of libtool. > > > > The binutils people say it's a problem with imlib2. Recent binutils is > > more fussy about non-PIC code where it should be PIC (an explicit change > > they made), and it seems that imlib2's use of loaders (or how it builds > > them) is buggy. As far as the binutils guys are concerned, imlib2 has > > been broken all along and it's only being revealed by the latest > > binutils. > > aah.. in a matter of 30 seconds i've narrowed it... it's the mmx asm - disable > mmx and it runs happily.. now what about inlined asm is making binutils severely > unhappy (i couldnt even get a backtrace - it was barfing whilst mmaping > libc.so.6 - very nasty..) See? I knew you'd be better at finding this bug than me :) I never even looked at the .S files :) Tom. -- .^. .-------------------------------------------------------. /V\ | Tom Gilbert, London, England | http://linuxbrit.co.uk | /( )\ | Open Source/UNIX consultant | to...@li... | ^^-^^ `-------------------------------------------------------' |