From: Didier C. <did...@sp...> - 2004-06-30 01:33:59
|
On 29/06/04, at 12:18 -0700, Shish <shi...@ya...> wrote: > [...] > > RPM, grrr > > portage seems much easier to hack / fix than RPM - eg, Rather than wait for a > new .rpm to be released, you can download the current source tarball, and just > change the checksums in the portage database. >[...] Depends on the people. RPMS are not that difficult to build. I normally take source autoconf/automake packages and convert them to rpm. There's a more or less straightforward recipe to do that. Well when you're use to it it takes 5 minutes to do that. So with rpms, I can track better which files are in my system and where. :-) So RPMS are not that much of a headache. With kind regards, Didier. --- PhD student. Singapore Synchrotron Light Source (SSLS) 5 Research Link, Singapore 117603 Email: didierbe at sps dot nus dot edu dot sg Web: http://ssls.nus.edu.sg |