From: Jérôme P. <ng...@gm...> - 2013-01-12 03:56:12
Attachments:
signature.asc
|
Trunk efl tree requires the program check to successfully configure the build: ---- 8< ------------ checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for doxygen... yes checking for CHECK... no configure: error: Package requirements (check >= 0.9.5) were not met: No package 'check' found ---- 8< ------------ This should be conditional as it is only needed for unit tests. Don't really know how to fix it. We could make it conditional to the valgrind support, or maybe make another specific option to configure. -- Jérôme Pinot http://ngc891.blogdns.net/ |
From: Doug N. <sci...@ou...> - 2013-01-12 04:14:06
|
It already is conditional. It only requires check if you build the tests, which the dev profile does by default. If you don't want the tests, just pass --with-tests=none and it shouldn't require check. Doug ---------------------------------------- Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 12:55:57 +0900 From: ng...@gm... To: enl...@li... Subject: [E-devel] "check" requirement for efl build Trunk efl tree requires the program check to successfully configure the build: ---- 8< ------------ checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for doxygen... yes checking for CHECK... no configure: error: Package requirements (check >= 0.9.5) were not met: No package 'check' found ---- 8< ------------ This should be conditional as it is only needed for unit tests. Don't really know how to fix it. We could make it conditional to the valgrind support, or maybe make another specific option to configure. -- Jérôme Pinot http://ngc891.blogdns.net/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122912 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enl...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel |
From: Tom H. <to...@st...> - 2013-01-12 13:25:56
|
I've mentioned it before, why the heck is that a configure thing and not just a make thing? On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Doug Newgard <sci...@ou...> wrote: > It already is conditional. It only requires check if you build the tests, > which > the dev profile does by default. If you don't want the tests, just pass > --with-tests=none and it shouldn't require check. > > Doug > > ---------------------------------------- > Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 12:55:57 +0900 > From: ng...@gm... > To: enl...@li... > Subject: [E-devel] "check" requirement for efl build > > > Trunk efl tree requires the program check to successfully configure the > build: > > ---- 8< ------------ > checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config > checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes > checking for doxygen... yes > checking for CHECK... no > configure: error: Package requirements (check >= 0.9.5) were not met: > > No package 'check' found > ---- 8< ------------ > > This should be conditional as it is only needed for unit tests. > Don't really know how to fix it. We could make it conditional to the > valgrind support, or maybe make another specific option to configure. > > -- > Jérôme Pinot > http://ngc891.blogdns.net/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, > MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current > with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft > MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122912 > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, > MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current > with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft > MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122912 > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > -- Tom. |
From: Gustavo S. B. <bar...@pr...> - 2013-01-12 15:41:15
|
On Saturday, January 12, 2013, Tom Hacohen wrote: > I've mentioned it before, why the heck is that a configure thing and not > just a make thing? Because it is a library and must be detected otherwise the tests won't compile. > > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Doug Newgard <sci...@ou...<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > It already is conditional. It only requires check if you build the tests, > > which > > the dev profile does by default. If you don't want the tests, just pass > > --with-tests=none and it shouldn't require check. > > > > Doug > > > > ---------------------------------------- > > Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 12:55:57 +0900 > > From: ng...@gm... <javascript:;> > > To: enl...@li... <javascript:;> > > Subject: [E-devel] "check" requirement for efl build > > > > > > Trunk efl tree requires the program check to successfully configure the > > build: > > > > ---- 8< ------------ > > checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config > > checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes > > checking for doxygen... yes > > checking for CHECK... no > > configure: error: Package requirements (check >= 0.9.5) were not met: > > > > No package 'check' found > > ---- 8< ------------ > > > > This should be conditional as it is only needed for unit tests. > > Don't really know how to fix it. We could make it conditional to the > > valgrind support, or maybe make another specific option to configure. > > > > -- > > Jérôme Pinot > > http://ngc891.blogdns.net/ > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, > > MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current > > with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft > > MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122912 > > _______________________________________________ > > enlightenment-devel mailing list > > enl...@li... <javascript:;> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, > > MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current > > with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft > > MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122912 > > _______________________________________________ > > enlightenment-devel mailing list > > enl...@li... <javascript:;> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > > > > > > -- > Tom. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, > MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current > with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft > MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122912 > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enl...@li... <javascript:;> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: bar...@gm... Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 |
From: Tom H. <to...@st...> - 2013-01-13 12:24:23
|
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri < bar...@pr...> wrote: > On Saturday, January 12, 2013, Tom Hacohen wrote: > > > I've mentioned it before, why the heck is that a configure thing and not > > just a make thing? > > > Because it is a library and must be detected otherwise the tests won't > compile. > > I know that. What I meant is: why is it not auto-detected and then just works or doesn't when you "make check"? It's not like the auto detection things that you only find out about in run-time, this will show up in compile time and saves the need to fiddle with this useless option. -- Tom. |
From: Gustavo S. B. <bar...@pr...> - 2013-01-13 21:11:15
|
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Tom Hacohen <to...@st...> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri < > bar...@pr...> wrote: > >> On Saturday, January 12, 2013, Tom Hacohen wrote: >> >> > I've mentioned it before, why the heck is that a configure thing and not >> > just a make thing? >> >> >> Because it is a library and must be detected otherwise the tests won't >> compile. >> >> > I know that. What I meant is: why is it not auto-detected and then just > works or doesn't when you "make check"? It's not like the auto detection > things that you only find out about in run-time, this will show up in > compile time and saves the need to fiddle with this useless option. it's not an useless option. If you're a developer you must do the tests... at least that should be the point in having them. There should be no option, we still have "--with-tests", maybe one day that should go away and we always do them. I know right now half of our tests are broken, but we should fix that, not ignore them :-) -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: bar...@gm... Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 |
From: Tom H. <to...@st...> - 2013-01-14 00:17:48
|
You know I'm the last to ignore tests. I'm not saying we should ignore tests, I'm just saying I shouldn't need to be bothered with enabling them explicitly when it can be done automatically without having any bad side-effects. On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri < bar...@pr...> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Tom Hacohen <to...@st...> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri < > > bar...@pr...> wrote: > > > >> On Saturday, January 12, 2013, Tom Hacohen wrote: > >> > >> > I've mentioned it before, why the heck is that a configure thing and > not > >> > just a make thing? > >> > >> > >> Because it is a library and must be detected otherwise the tests won't > >> compile. > >> > >> > > I know that. What I meant is: why is it not auto-detected and then just > > works or doesn't when you "make check"? It's not like the auto detection > > things that you only find out about in run-time, this will show up in > > compile time and saves the need to fiddle with this useless option. > > it's not an useless option. If you're a developer you must do the > tests... at least that should be the point in having them. There > should be no option, we still have "--with-tests", maybe one day that > should go away and we always do them. > > I know right now half of our tests are broken, but we should fix that, > not ignore them :-) > > -- > Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > http://profusion.mobi embedded systems > -------------------------------------- > MSN: bar...@gm... > Skype: gsbarbieri > Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, > MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current > with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft > MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_123012 > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > -- Tom. |
From: Gustavo S. B. <bar...@pr...> - 2013-01-14 00:29:06
|
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Tom Hacohen <to...@st...> wrote: > You know I'm the last to ignore tests. I'm not saying we should ignore > tests, I'm just saying I shouldn't need to be bothered with enabling them > explicitly when it can be done automatically without having any bad > side-effects. it is enabled automatically (if dev profile) and there is a NICE side effect: if will remind you if you forget to install check by failing :-) -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: bar...@gm... Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 |