enlightenment-devel

Re: [E-devel] header size...

[Daniel J. S. <seo...@gm...>]

so the topic has been changed successfully :)
i prefer separating edc as well though.

Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Jul 31, 2011 10:19 PM, "Tom Hacohen" <tom...@pa...>
wrote:
> On 31/07/11 16:15, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> when using form makefiles and we have $(top_srcdir) and other such fun in
the
>> past i found it made files that edje_decc doesnt like as all the relative
paths
>> make it think theres a security violation (try to write file outside of
decc
>> dir)
>>
>>
>
> Yeah, I know, and I think what I did should have triggered it, doesn't
> it? I also tried doing: "edje_cc ../../../tmp/../tmp/edje/bla.edc" which
> also didn't trigger it.
>
> Seems to me that it's fixed now...
>
> --
> Tom.
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Got Input? Slashdot Needs You.
> Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often.
> Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey
> _______________________________________________
> enlightenment-devel mailing list
> enl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Re: [E-devel] header size...

[Tom H. <tom...@pa...>]

On 31/07/11 16:20, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> Yeah, I know, and I think what I did should have triggered it, doesn't
> it? I also tried doing: "edje_cc ../../../tmp/../tmp/edje/bla.edc" which
> also didn't trigger it.
>
> Seems to me that it's fixed now...
>


Ok, I split default.edc, according to my tests it works for me. Please 
let me know if it doesn't work for you.

--
Tom.