From: Sebastian Dransfeld <sebastid@st...> - 2006-01-13 12:01:29
David Seikel wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:28:51 +0100 Sebastian Dransfeld
> <sebastid@...> wrote:
>>BTW. ECORE_EVENT is correct since ecore_exe is in the main ecore dir
>>and lib. If it should be ECORE_EXE, then ecore_exe should be a subdir
> This has been discussed here for a week. The change is for consistency
> from the point of view of the coder using it. This coder doesn't care
> how things are organised internally, they just care that other, similar
> things are called ECORE_*_EVENT_*.
> ecore_exe has grown a bit recently, and now has lots of similarities to
> ecore_con and ecore_ipc due to the fork'n'pipe IPC. I'm trying to iron
> out the differences to make life easier for coders using them. It's
> all IPC, even if ecore_exe can be used without the IPC component, and it
> should all work in similar ways, with similar names.
Get latest updates about Open Source Projects, Conferences and News.