From: Carsten H. (T. R. <ra...@ra...> - 2011-01-29 03:48:06
|
Finally after a lkong time coming, we are pleased to announce the 1.0 release of the core EFL libraries (With the exception of Eet at 1.4). This has been many years coming. The following libraries have been released: * Eina - 1.0.0 * Eet - 1.4.0 * Evas - 1.0.0 * Ecore - 1.0.0 * Embryo - 1.0.0 * Edje - 1.0.0 * E_Dbus - 1.0.0 * Efreet - 1.0.0 * Eeze - 1.0.0 You can download the respective libraries from our Download Page: http://www.enlightenment.org/p.php?p=download&l=en -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ra...@ra... |
From: Ralph S. <gen...@bl...> - 2011-01-29 05:50:02
|
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 12:43:25 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <ra...@ra...> wrote: > Finally after a lkong time coming, we are pleased to announce the 1.0 > release of the core EFL libraries (With the exception of Eet at 1.4). > This has been many years coming. The following libraries have been > released: > > * Eina - 1.0.0 > * Eet - 1.4.0 > * Evas - 1.0.0 > * Ecore - 1.0.0 > * Embryo - 1.0.0 > * Edje - 1.0.0 > * E_Dbus - 1.0.0 > * Efreet - 1.0.0 > * Eeze - 1.0.0 > > You can download the respective libraries from our Download Page: > > http://www.enlightenment.org/p.php?p=download&l=en > A long awaited moment. Congratulations to the whole team. |
From: Vincent T. <vt...@un...> - 2011-01-29 07:44:59
|
Hey now that the EFL are release, maybe we should apply the patches ONLY if the ChangeLog is updated (if needed). Otherwise the patch is reverted. Do you agree ? Vincent On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 12:43:25 +0900 > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <ra...@ra...> wrote: > >> Finally after a lkong time coming, we are pleased to announce the 1.0 >> release of the core EFL libraries (With the exception of Eet at 1.4). >> This has been many years coming. The following libraries have been >> released: >> >> * Eina - 1.0.0 >> * Eet - 1.4.0 >> * Evas - 1.0.0 >> * Ecore - 1.0.0 >> * Embryo - 1.0.0 >> * Edje - 1.0.0 >> * E_Dbus - 1.0.0 >> * Efreet - 1.0.0 >> * Eeze - 1.0.0 >> >> You can download the respective libraries from our Download Page: >> >> http://www.enlightenment.org/p.php?p=download&l=en >> > > A long awaited moment. Congratulations to the whole team. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! > Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! > Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires > February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > > |
From: Iván B. (S. <sac...@gm...> - 2011-01-29 07:48:50
|
2011/1/29 Vincent Torri <vt...@un...>: > > Hey > > now that the EFL are release, maybe we should apply the patches ONLY if > the ChangeLog is updated (if needed). Otherwise the patch is reverted. Do > you agree ? > s/reverted/rejected/ since I think SVN can actually do that. It's probably a good idea, otherwise we'll keep thinking "damn this annoying vtorri guy and his changelogs" every two and a half hours. > Vincent > > On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > >> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 12:43:25 +0900 >> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <ra...@ra...> wrote: >> >>> Finally after a lkong time coming, we are pleased to announce the 1.0 >>> release of the core EFL libraries (With the exception of Eet at 1.4). >>> This has been many years coming. The following libraries have been >>> released: >>> >>> * Eina - 1.0.0 >>> * Eet - 1.4.0 >>> * Evas - 1.0.0 >>> * Ecore - 1.0.0 >>> * Embryo - 1.0.0 >>> * Edje - 1.0.0 >>> * E_Dbus - 1.0.0 >>> * Efreet - 1.0.0 >>> * Eeze - 1.0.0 >>> >>> You can download the respective libraries from our Download Page: >>> >>> http://www.enlightenment.org/p.php?p=download&l=en >>> >> >> A long awaited moment. Congratulations to the whole team. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! >> Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! >> Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires >> February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d >> _______________________________________________ >> enlightenment-devel mailing list >> enl...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! > Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! > Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires > February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > |
From: Vincent T. <vt...@un...> - 2011-01-29 08:00:49
|
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote: > 2011/1/29 Vincent Torri <vt...@un...>: >> >> Hey >> >> now that the EFL are release, maybe we should apply the patches ONLY if >> the ChangeLog is updated (if needed). Otherwise the patch is reverted. Do >> you agree ? >> > > s/reverted/rejected/ since I think SVN can actually do that. > It's probably a good idea, otherwise we'll keep thinking "damn this > annoying vtorri guy and his changelogs" every two and a half hours. And about the moap tool ? We also didn't say anything about the order of the entries in the ChangeLog. Eet put them at the end, but most other projects put them at top (i find that more natural, as we are first interested by the latest changes). Vincent |
From: Tom H. <to...@st...> - 2011-01-29 08:33:16
|
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Iván Briano (Sachiel) <sac...@gm...>wrote: > s/reverted/rejected/ since I think SVN can actually do that. > It's probably a good idea, otherwise we'll keep thinking "damn this > annoying vtorri guy and his changelogs" every two and a half hours. > > I disagree. You don't want to force people who only "added a bit of documentation" or even use git-svn to go nuts. -- Tom. |
From: Vincent T. <vt...@un...> - 2011-01-29 08:42:43
|
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Tom Hacohen wrote: > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Iván Briano (Sachiel) > <sac...@gm...>wrote: > >> s/reverted/rejected/ since I think SVN can actually do that. >> It's probably a good idea, otherwise we'll keep thinking "damn this >> annoying vtorri guy and his changelogs" every two and a half hours. >> >> > I disagree. You don't want to force people who only "added a bit of > documentation" or even use git-svn to go nuts. if we are not strict, it will be a huge mess. Vincent |
From: Carsten H. (T. R. <ra...@ra...> - 2011-01-29 09:48:05
|
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:42:36 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri <vt...@un...> said: > > > On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Tom Hacohen wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Iván Briano (Sachiel) > > <sac...@gm...>wrote: > > > >> s/reverted/rejected/ since I think SVN can actually do that. > >> It's probably a good idea, otherwise we'll keep thinking "damn this > >> annoying vtorri guy and his changelogs" every two and a half hours. > >> > >> > > I disagree. You don't want to force people who only "added a bit of > > documentation" or even use git-svn to go nuts. > > if we are not strict, it will be a huge mess. i agree with tom. changelog is about summarizing REAL changes so on a new release we have them all collected already. fixing a typo in some docs or "fixing code formatting" isnt worthy of a changelog. there isnt black and white here. its a matter of good judgment. if we see these things as black & white we w0ill have a useless changelog. thats what svn's log is for. if you implement some feature over several days and many commits, there is no need for many changelog entires. there is only the need for 1 changelog saying that you added the feature. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ra...@ra... |
From: Rui M. S. S. <rm...@14...> - 2011-01-30 00:34:14
|
Em 29-01-2011 09:48, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) escreveu: > On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:42:36 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri<vt...@un...> > said: > >> >> >> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Tom Hacohen wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Iván Briano (Sachiel) >>> <sac...@gm...>wrote: >>> >>>> s/reverted/rejected/ since I think SVN can actually do that. >>>> It's probably a good idea, otherwise we'll keep thinking "damn this >>>> annoying vtorri guy and his changelogs" every two and a half hours. >>>> >>>> >>> I disagree. You don't want to force people who only "added a bit of >>> documentation" or even use git-svn to go nuts. >> >> if we are not strict, it will be a huge mess. > > i agree with tom. changelog is about summarizing REAL changes so on a new > release we have them all collected already. fixing a typo in some docs or > "fixing code formatting" isnt worthy of a changelog. > > there isnt black and white here. its a matter of good judgment. if we see these > things as black& white we w0ill have a useless changelog. thats what svn's log > is for. if you implement some feature over several days and many commits, there > is no need for many changelog entires. there is only the need for 1 changelog > saying that you added the feature. Can we please use a common format for changelog? I propose following the GNU standard which is quite common: http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#Change-Logs Best, Rui |
From: Mike B. <mi...@ze...> - 2011-01-29 08:38:44
|
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 10:32:50 +0200 Tom Hacohen <to...@st...> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Iván Briano (Sachiel) > <sac...@gm...>wrote: > > > s/reverted/rejected/ since I think SVN can actually do that. > > It's probably a good idea, otherwise we'll keep thinking "damn this > > annoying vtorri guy and his changelogs" every two and a half hours. > > > > > I disagree. You don't want to force people who only "added a bit of > documentation" or even use git-svn to go nuts. > > -- > Tom. Alternatively, we can just point it out and they can fix it. -- Mike Blumenkrantz Zentific: NULL pointer dereferences now 50% off! |
From: Tom H. <to...@st...> - 2011-01-29 08:40:23
|
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz <mi...@ze...>wrote: > Alternatively, we can just point it out and they can fix it. > > I'm not sure I quite get you. Lets say I want to do a minor documentation fix, do you really want svn to force me edit the changelog as well?! -- Tom. |
From: Mike B. <mi...@ze...> - 2011-01-29 08:48:30
|
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 10:39:57 +0200 Tom Hacohen <to...@st...> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz <mi...@ze...>wrote: > > > Alternatively, we can just point it out and they can fix it. > > > > > I'm not sure I quite get you. Lets say I want to do a minor documentation > fix, do you really > want svn to force me edit the changelog as well?! > > -- > Tom. Umm...I meant if someone forgets to update the changelog when they should have we can email them... -- Mike Blumenkrantz Zentific: NULL pointer dereferences now 50% off! |
From: Tom H. <to...@st...> - 2011-01-29 08:53:23
|
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:48 AM, Mike Blumenkrantz <mi...@ze...>wrote: > Umm...I meant if someone forgets to update the changelog when they should > have > we can email them... > > My problem is with svn enforcement, not with making sure we update the changelog. -- Tom. |
From: Vincent T. <vt...@un...> - 2011-01-29 09:53:23
|
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:42:36 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri <vt...@un...> > said: > >> >> >> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Tom Hacohen wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Iván Briano (Sachiel) >>> <sac...@gm...>wrote: >>> >>>> s/reverted/rejected/ since I think SVN can actually do that. >>>> It's probably a good idea, otherwise we'll keep thinking "damn this >>>> annoying vtorri guy and his changelogs" every two and a half hours. >>>> >>>> >>> I disagree. You don't want to force people who only "added a bit of >>> documentation" or even use git-svn to go nuts. >> >> if we are not strict, it will be a huge mess. > > i agree with tom. changelog is about summarizing REAL changes so on a new > release i agree with that. What i wanted to say is that if changelog must be updated and is not, we revert. Vincent |
From: Leif M. <lei...@gm...> - 2011-01-29 10:00:48
|
Firstofall: Congratulations to everyone in the community espescially the developers :-) 2011/1/29 Vincent Torri <vt...@un...>: > > > On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > >> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:42:36 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri >> <vt...@un...> >> said: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Tom Hacohen wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Iván Briano (Sachiel) >>>> <sac...@gm...>wrote: >>>> >>>>> s/reverted/rejected/ since I think SVN can actually do that. >>>>> It's probably a good idea, otherwise we'll keep thinking "damn this >>>>> annoying vtorri guy and his changelogs" every two and a half hours. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I disagree. You don't want to force people who only "added a bit of >>>> documentation" or even use git-svn to go nuts. >>> >>> if we are not strict, it will be a huge mess. >> >> i agree with tom. changelog is about summarizing REAL changes so on a new >> release > > i agree with that. What i wanted to say is that if changelog must be updated > and is not, we revert. Maybe we can have tags enforcement for commit log? So it's easy to get a summary of logs for each tag as e.g. 'doc fixes' or whatever to aggregate in changelog? I guess else things will be forgotten and missed to be mentioned in release changelog over time. BR, Leif > > Vincent > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! > Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! > Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires > February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > > |
From: Carsten H. (T. R. <ra...@ra...> - 2011-01-29 12:14:42
|
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 10:53:14 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri <vt...@un...> said: > > > On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:42:36 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri <vt...@un...> > > said: > > > >> > >> > >> On Sat, 29 Jan 2011, Tom Hacohen wrote: > >> > >>> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Iván Briano (Sachiel) > >>> <sac...@gm...>wrote: > >>> > >>>> s/reverted/rejected/ since I think SVN can actually do that. > >>>> It's probably a good idea, otherwise we'll keep thinking "damn this > >>>> annoying vtorri guy and his changelogs" every two and a half hours. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> I disagree. You don't want to force people who only "added a bit of > >>> documentation" or even use git-svn to go nuts. > >> > >> if we are not strict, it will be a huge mess. > > > > i agree with tom. changelog is about summarizing REAL changes so on a new > > release > > i agree with that. What i wanted to say is that if changelog must be > updated and is not, we revert. we can choose i guess. revert or tell them to fix the changelog. either way it requires action. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ra...@ra... |
From: Jochen S. <cyc...@gm...> - 2011-01-29 23:55:12
|
On 01/29/2011 02:43 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > Finally after a lkong time coming, we are pleased to announce the 1.0 release > of the core EFL libraries (With the exception of Eet at 1.4). This has been > many years coming. The following libraries have been released: > > * Eina - 1.0.0 > * Eet - 1.4.0 > * Evas - 1.0.0 > * Ecore - 1.0.0 > * Embryo - 1.0.0 > * Edje - 1.0.0 > * E_Dbus - 1.0.0 > * Efreet - 1.0.0 > * Eeze - 1.0.0 > > You can download the respective libraries from our Download Page: > > http://www.enlightenment.org/p.php?p=download&l=en > Congrats to all E developers, you have done an amazing job! |
From: Daniel J. S. <seo...@gm...> - 2011-01-30 17:07:16
|
Congratulations! All the people in this community did the good job! I hope E will be distributed a lot and be popular. And I hope elementary 1.0 will be released soon! Thanks. Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Carsten Haitzler <ra...@ra...> wrote: > Finally after a lkong time coming, we are pleased to announce the 1.0 release > of the core EFL libraries (With the exception of Eet at 1.4). This has been > many years coming. The following libraries have been released: > > * Eina - 1.0.0 > * Eet - 1.4.0 > * Evas - 1.0.0 > * Ecore - 1.0.0 > * Embryo - 1.0.0 > * Edje - 1.0.0 > * E_Dbus - 1.0.0 > * Efreet - 1.0.0 > * Eeze - 1.0.0 > > You can download the respective libraries from our Download Page: > > http://www.enlightenment.org/p.php?p=download&l=en > > -- > ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- > The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) ra...@ra... > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! > Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! > Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires > February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d > _______________________________________________ > enlightenment-devel mailing list > enl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel > |