From: Mark R. B. <Mor...@ea...> - 2001-06-08 14:32:02
|
Hi yet again, esmall. sc1.c and sc5.c both #include <sys/io.h>, which I don't have. So, to see what functions this was supposed to provide, I just commented it out in both cases. And the compile worked just fine without it. WTF? Etcher was fine, though. Ta, Mark. |
From: Christian K. <kre...@in...> - 2001-06-08 14:39:53
|
"Mark R. Bowyer" wrote: > > Hi yet again, > > esmall. sc1.c and sc5.c both #include <sys/io.h>, which I don't have. So, to > see what functions this was supposed to provide, I just commented it out in both > cases. And the compile worked just fine without it. WTF? Well obviously it is not needed on at least Solaris, then. Chances are you won't need esmall at all, btw :) -- Christian. ________________________________________________________________________ mailto:kre...@cs... |
From: Mandrake (G. Harrison) <man...@ma...> - 2001-06-09 03:53:47
|
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 03:35:55PM +0000, Christian Kreibich wrote: > "Mark R. Bowyer" wrote: > >=20 > > Hi yet again, > >=20 > > esmall. sc1.c and sc5.c both #include <sys/io.h>, which I don't have. = So, to > > see what functions this was supposed to provide, I just commented it ou= t in both > > cases. And the compile worked just fine without it. WTF? >=20 > Well obviously it is not needed on at least Solaris, then. Chances are > you won't need esmall at all, btw :) though it is pretty cool in and of itself :) --=20 Mandrake | http://mandrake.net Cepstral, LLC | http://www.cepstral.com public key | http://mandrake.net/publickey |