Re: [enfs-devel] More thoughts on dtree

[Tramm H. <hu...@sw...>]

I wrote:
> Scott lifted the dtree code from Linux's procfs for the most part, but
> it is all embedded in the skelfs module.

And as I read through it, I see that it has implemented its own VFS
internally.  That's not really efficient...

Should we consider integrating it to use the enfs VFS layer instead?
It could be written as a module, which when combined with the stackability
provides naming ontop of a simpler system.

One thing it does not appear to address is writing the dtree info
to a store.  That would have to be added before it could be used for
the naming of a persistent filesystem.

Trammell
-- 
  o   hu...@sw...                                         O___|   
 /|\  http://www.swcp.com/~hudson/          M 240.476.1373    /\  \_  
 <<   KC5RNF                                H 505.315.5133    \ \/\_\  
  0                                                            U \_  |