Re: [Embedlets-dev] Re: Distributions....
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
tkosan
|
From: Holger B. <hba...@ma...> - 2003-04-03 05:18:19
|
The OP of this thread is underway or gone lost in space on my side. If you want to 'Release' via CVS, why don't you use CVS? There are Branching and Tagging technics to solve the leading-edge-HEAD and the stable-release Branch issue. This is what CVS is for. Do not get it yet. What is a "Zip"? What is the difference between the User and the 'who-not-be-named'? What about backporting and bugfixing? bax Am Donnerstag, 03.04.03, um 05:14 Uhr (Europe/Budapest) schrieb Brill Pappin: > Topic tags:[ARCH][JAPL][WIRING][DOCS][MGMT][STRATEGY][NEWBIE] > _______________________________________________ > > >> Let me repeat....CVS is for core Embedlet/Outpost developers. Users >> should stick to published (zipped) releases. > > Sorry guy, I don't have time tonight to read back through this > thread... > just happened to see this. > > It looks as if someone wants to "release" embedlets from the CVS > repository? > I don't think you will find a *single* project that does this, for good > reason, though we can easily provide a "DIY" ant build file for > hard-core > people that will check everything out... I don't recommend > *distributing > releases* via CVS. > > - Brill Pappin > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: > Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! > No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server > http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Embedlets-developer mailing list > Emb...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/embedlets-developer > > Holger Baxmann - bitwind e.K. 41539 Dormagen/NRW/Germany Vom-Stein-Str. 29 +49 2133 537747 |