RE: [Embedlets-dev] Re: JStamp vs TINI bytecode execution speed?

[Christopher S. <cs...@oo...>]

Systronix has a feature comparison chart as well:

http://jstik.systronix.com/compare.htm

> Topic tags:[ARCH][JAPL][WIRING][DOCS][MGMT][STRATEGY][NEWBIE]
> _______________________________________________
>
> Chris pointed me to James' uVM benchmarks on the JStamp list (now why
> didn't I remember to look there?).
>
> From a quick review of James's testing it looks like a TINI is
> from 15-20 times
> slower than a JStamp.
>
> This means that a TINI will be running around 150-200K bytecodes per
> second, as compared to the 3M that a JStamp can do, and 15M for a JStik.
> What's interesting is that uVM is is about 1/2 the speed of a
> JStamp (for the
> 20mhz PIC) or about the same (for the 40mhz PIC chip).
>
> Granted, these tests were simple ones that would not reflect a
> "real world" mix
> of bytecodes being executed, but their probably close enough.
>
> What is intriguing is that according to the above, the TINI will
> be the least
> capable target platform (based on processor speed alone and ignoring JVM
> features and memory) that we are considering.  Bit of a
> revelation for me,
> since I had just assumed that the PIC's running uVM would take
> that position.
> Goes to show you....always check your assumptions.
>
> Kind of leads me to believe if we can implement Embedlets on a
> TINI and have
> enough horsepower to do some "useful" applications on that
> platform, then the
> rest will be no problem.
>
>
>
> Andrzej Jan Taramina
> Chaeron Corporation: Enterprise System Solutions
> http://www.chaeron.com
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Embedlets-developer mailing list
> Emb...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/embedlets-developer
>