RE: [Embedlets-dev] Re: [Arch]embedlets & security

[James C. <ca...@vi...>]

>It does add significant cost to the product, Java iButtons are not cheap..

Maybe I should put a muvium device into an iButton container and sell them
for $10 :-)



> -----Original Message-----
> From: emb...@li...
> [mailto:emb...@li...]On Behalf Of Jac
> Kersing
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 1:20 AM
> To: emb...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Embedlets-dev] Re: [Arch]embedlets & security
>
>
> Topic tags:[ARCH][JAPL][WIRING][DOCS][MGMT][STRATEGY][NEWBIE]
> _______________________________________________
>
> On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Ted Kosan wrote:
>
> > If we go with TINI/TStik as a reference platform (which is the way I am
> > also leaning for a number of reasons) then we can use the iButton holder
> > clip that is present on most TINI/TStik socket boards to hold a JavaCard
> > compliant iButton that could handle our digital signing and verification
> > needs.
>
> That will significantly slow responces. The Java Buttons are far from fast
> and the data exchange over 1-wire is not too speedy as well. However, it
> is a valid option (and would allow me to use my Java buttons for something
> usefull :-)
>
> It does add significant cost to the product, Java iButtons are not cheap..
>
> Regards,
>
> Jac
>
> --
>  Jac Kersing            Technical Consultant   The-Box Development
>  j.k...@th...                         http://www.the-box.com
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
> SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
> http://www.vasoftware.com
> _______________________________________________
> Embedlets-developer mailing list
> Emb...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/embedlets-developer
>
>