Thread: [Embedlets-dev] Re: Adapter
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
tkosan
|
From: Andrzej J. T. <an...@ch...> - 2003-03-15 22:07:07
|
> The description for the org.embedlet.Adapter class currently reads as follows: > > 'The Adapter class is the base class for all Embedlets' > I think that 'Embedlets' here should be 'Adapters'. The newer source file in CVS has been corrected already (I posted about that a week ago). > Also, could a more > detailed description of what an Adapter is be added here? Be my guest! ;-) Once we figure out what an Adapter looks like, the docs will be updated. Andrzej Jan Taramina Chaeron Corporation: Enterprise System Solutions http://www.chaeron.com |
|
From: Brill P. <bri...@ro...> - 2003-03-16 04:47:55
|
I've begun going through the Embedlet/Outpost/Outhouse source and have a question (and more to come). Is the timer service you have set up emulating a hardware timer, or is it a service in general? (I think a "service in general" would be useful). - Brill Pappin |
|
From: Brill P. <bri...@ro...> - 2003-03-16 04:59:08
|
Just a "convention" request. It would be helpful if everyone explicitly specified their imports rather than use the ".*" global import... it makes it much harder to find out where something came from when tracing/reading the code... the code-base is still fairly small, so it's not impossible to find things, however it will soon become a major pain. - Brill Pappin |
|
From: Ted K. <tk...@ya...> - 2003-03-16 08:21:06
|
Brill stated: > It would be helpful if everyone explicitly specified their imports rather > than use the ".*" global import... it makes it much harder to find out where > something came from when tracing/reading the code... I would second this if it is feasible. Ted __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online http://webhosting.yahoo.com |