|
From: Joe B. <joe...@gm...> - 2019-07-10 15:51:04
|
Serial is hex, could it be case sensitive in mysql? 0x prefix? this seems to suggest something like that? But mostly ...just a guess "Unable to find revocation information for certificate with serial '2ffff4' " Regards, Joe On Tue, Jul 9, 2019, 06:45 Tomas Gustavsson <to...@pr...> wrote: > Hi, > > OCSP responses does not have anything to do with the CRL itself. Once the > CRL has been imported each certificate status is in its own record in the > CertificateData table. This is where status is read when reponses are > created. > If there are issues, it is in that case related to the import of the CRL. > > Verify that certificate records are created in CertificateData when > importing the CRL. > Also, a debug log when making OCSP request will tell exact details of what > the responder finds in the database or not. > > Regards, > Tomas > > > On July 8, 2019 4:59:06 PM GMT+02:00, ohaya--- via Ejbca-develop < > ejb...@li...> wrote: >> >> [Re-sending, as this (handling of large CRLs) is still a problem and is >> still not working.] >> >> >> >> On Monday, July 1, 2019, 12:47:23 PM UTC, <oh...@ya...> wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I think that I've found how to set/change the max_allowed_packet on the >> client (i.e., EJBCA) side, by editing the Mysql URL in the >> standalone/configuration/standalone.xml to: >> >> <connection-url>jdbc:mysql:// >> 127.0.0.1:3306/ejbca?maxAllowedPacket=104857600</connection-url> >> >> However, when I test the OCSP Responder with a serial number (and CA >> cert) from the CA with the large (>71MB) CRL file, I am still getting >> "unknown" and EJBCA OCSP Responder is still NOT FINDING the cert serial >> number. >> >> NOTE, again, that I can test with certs (and CA cert) that have smaller >> CRL files, and those tests work. >> >> So it is only when testing with the large CRL file that is failing with >> the OCSP Responder. >> >> This seems like a potential BUG for EJBCA OCSP Responder? >> >> Please advise. >> >> Thanks, >> Jim >> On Saturday, June 29, 2019, 3:36:18 PM EDT, <oh...@ya...> wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> BTW, just to check, I have actually gone through the process of getting >> the crlData from the MySQL using mysql client (I had to add the >> --max_allowed-packet=100M to the mysql command) and I was able to actually >> get the PEM from the Mysql database that way. >> >> So, I KNOW that the entire CRL is in the Mysql database, and yet when I >> run an "openssl ocsp" test against the EJBCA OCSP Responder, it says it >> cannot find the revocation. >> >> OCSP Request Data: >> Version: 1 (0x0) >> Requestor List: >> Certificate ID: >> Hash Algorithm: sha1 >> Issuer Name Hash: 37E3972FD58A03EEC31D8DF5F6F03F6AE4F5C600 >> Issuer Key Hash: 3929A80864E28F83AA816147119133F85A37A6E4 >> Serial Number: 2FFFF4 >> Request Extensions: >> OCSP Nonce: >> 04103054A60A55E389B239A55228033D8F62 >> Response verify OK >> 0x2FFFF4: unknown >> This Update: Jun 29 19:31:02 2019 GMT >> >> >> In the server log: >> >> 2019-06-29 15:31:02,150 DEBUG >> [org.cesecore.certificates.ocsp.OcspResponseGeneratorSessionBean] (default >> task-1) Unable to find revocation information for certificate with serial >> '2ffff4' from issuer 'CN=XXX....' >> >> >> Honestly, I am no 100% sure that the problem is that max_allowe_packet is >> too small on the mysql client side, but that is my best guess. >> >> What I AM sure is that the CRL is in mysql, but when I do a test with >> OCSP Responder, it cannot find the cert serial number in the CRL. >> >> Jim >> >> >> On Saturday, June 29, 2019, 4:52:20 AM EDT, <oh...@ya...> wrote: >> >> >> Hi Tomas, >> >> I already had the max_allowed_packet configured on the Mysql server-side >> (in /etc/my.cnf). >> >> So as I said, when testing with mysql (client) I had to include >> "--max_allowed_packet=100M" on the mysql (client) command line, e.g.: >> >> mysql -u root -p --max_allowed_packet=100M >> >> If I did NOT include the "--max_allowed_packet=100M" on that command >> line, then when I did a "select" on the field base64Crl, I would get an >> error. >> >> I suspect that EJBCA is acting as a Mysql client, so, in order to work >> with such large CRLs, there needs to be some way to set the equivalent of >> the "--max_allowed_packet=100M" on the EJBCA side. >> >> How can I do that? >> >> If that can't be done, then I think that when EJBCA tries to retrieve the >> CRL from the Mysql, it (EJBCA) will see the same error. >> >> Thanks, >> Jim >> >> On Saturday, June 29, 2019, 3:25:47 AM EDT, Tomas Gustavsson < >> to...@pr...> wrote: >> >> >> >> You configure max allowed packet size in you MySQL configuration on the >> MySQL server. >> >> /Tomas >> >> On 2019-06-29 02:19, o haya via Ejbca-develop wrote: >> > I am not 100% sure, but I think I know what might be causing this >> problem. >> > >> > I did a test, where I just tried to log into mysql and do the following >> > select: >> > >> > select base64Crl INTO OUTFILE '/var/lib/mysql-files/xx.out' from CRLData >> > where cRLNumber=3167; >> > >> > and I got an error saying that the result was more >> than max_allowed_packet. >> > >> > So then I did the same thing, but for the mysql command I used: >> > >> > mysql -u root -p --max_allowed_packet=100M >> > >> > and then when I did that same select, I was able to output the entire >> > CRL as a PEM. >> > >> > So, I am theorizing that that is what is happening with EJBCA, i.e., >> > when I run the "openssl ocsp" command, EJBCA is querying the base64CRL >> > but the result is too large and so that is causing the query to fail. >> > >> > So the question now is: How can I cause EJBCA OCSP Responder to run >> > with a larger max_allowed_packet so that the query succeeds (and then >> > hopefully EJBCA OCSP Responder will be able to check the revocation >> > properly)? >> > >> > Does anyone know how that can be done? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Jim >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Friday, June 28, 2019, 07:16:39 PM UTC, o haya <oh...@ya...> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > As discussed in an earlier thread, it looks like I was able to import a >> > large (> 71MB) CRL file into EJBCA (as an OCSP Responder), so now, I am >> > doing testing, using "openssl ocsp" to send requests into the EJBCA OCSP >> > Responder: >> > >> > openssl ocsp -issuer <CA_CERT> -VAfile <SIGNING_CERT> -req_text -serial >> > 0x<CERT_SERIAL> -host <HOST:PORT> >> > >> > But it looks like no matter what serial number I use, whether the serial >> > number is in the CRL or not, returns a response like: >> > >> > OCSP Request Data: >> > Version: 1 (0x0) >> > Requestor List: >> > Certificate ID: >> > Hash Algorithm: sha1 >> > Issuer Name Hash: 37...00 >> > Issuer Key Hash: 39...E4 >> > Serial Number: 2FFFF9 >> > Request Extensions: >> > OCSP Nonce: >> > 041078B1311984A110B5E19C8DC4895F485B >> > Response verify OK >> > 0x2FFFF9: unknown >> > This Update: Jun 28 18:56:20 2019 GMT >> > >> > i.e., it looks like the EJBCA OCSP Responder is not able to actually >> > find any revoked certs in the CRL? >> > >> > >> > FYI, I *KNOW* that the EJBCA OCSP Responder is functioning properly, in >> > general, because I can do the same test against a smaller CRL in the >> > same EJBCA OCSP Responder, for CA simpleca, and I can get an actual >> > "Revoked" response: >> > >> > [root@ejbca testocspresponder]# openssl ocsp -issuer simpleca.crt >> > -VAfile simplecabinding2.crt -serial 0x008486394c03e1f5d9 -req_text >> > -host 192.168.0.28:80 >> > OCSP Request Data: >> > Version: 1 (0x0) >> > Requestor List: >> > Certificate ID: >> > Hash Algorithm: sha1 >> > Issuer Name Hash: 0C16107310427EA4ADB3C6436915CE44A15FFE55 >> > Issuer Key Hash: E2533BF85F8C7CA60A411BF5458B2DC3B5232B6E >> > Serial Number: 8486394C03E1F5D9 >> > Request Extensions: >> > OCSP Nonce: >> > 04109A09CC1C56D26AA73CB4C3FB1EC7CF1F >> > Response verify OK >> > 0x008486394c03e1f5d9: revoked >> > This Update: Jun 28 19:12:48 2019 GMT >> > Reason: unspecified >> > Revocation Time: May 26 12:30:44 2019 GMT >> > >> > So it seems like the EJBCA OCSP Responder is either not processing the >> > large CRL properly, or maybe the import didn't import the large CRL into >> > the OCSP Responder correctly. >> > >> > Can anyone tell me how do I diagnose this problem? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Jim >> >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Ejbca-develop mailing list >> > Ejb...@li... >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ejbca-develop >> > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ejbca-develop mailing list >> Ejb...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ejbca-develop >> >> _______________________________________________ > Ejbca-develop mailing list > Ejb...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ejbca-develop > |