|
From: <oh...@ya...> - 2019-07-01 12:47:26
|
Hi,
I think that I've found how to set/change the max_allowed_packet on the client (i.e., EJBCA) side, by editing the Mysql URL in the standalone/configuration/standalone.xml to:
<connection-url>jdbc:mysql://127.0.0.1:3306/ejbca?maxAllowedPacket=104857600</connection-url>
However, when I test the OCSP Responder with a serial number (and CA cert) from the CA with the large (>71MB) CRL file, I am still getting "unknown" and EJBCA OCSP Responder is still NOT FINDING the cert serial number.
NOTE, again, that I can test with certs (and CA cert) that have smaller CRL files, and those tests work.
So it is only when testing with the large CRL file that is failing with the OCSP Responder.
This seems like a potential BUG for EJBCA OCSP Responder?
Please advise.
Thanks,
Jim
On Saturday, June 29, 2019, 3:36:18 PM EDT, <oh...@ya...> wrote:
Hi,
BTW, just to check, I have actually gone through the process of getting the crlData from the MySQL using mysql client (I had to add the --max_allowed-packet=100M to the mysql command) and I was able to actually get the PEM from the Mysql database that way.
So, I KNOW that the entire CRL is in the Mysql database, and yet when I run an "openssl ocsp" test against the EJBCA OCSP Responder, it says it cannot find the revocation.
OCSP Request Data:
Version: 1 (0x0)
Requestor List:
Certificate ID:
Hash Algorithm: sha1
Issuer Name Hash: 37E3972FD58A03EEC31D8DF5F6F03F6AE4F5C600
Issuer Key Hash: 3929A80864E28F83AA816147119133F85A37A6E4
Serial Number: 2FFFF4
Request Extensions:
OCSP Nonce:
04103054A60A55E389B239A55228033D8F62
Response verify OK
0x2FFFF4: unknown
This Update: Jun 29 19:31:02 2019 GMT
In the server log:
2019-06-29 15:31:02,150 DEBUG [org.cesecore.certificates.ocsp.OcspResponseGeneratorSessionBean] (default task-1) Unable to find revocation information for certificate with serial '2ffff4' from issuer 'CN=XXX....'
Honestly, I am no 100% sure that the problem is that max_allowe_packet is too small on the mysql client side, but that is my best guess.
What I AM sure is that the CRL is in mysql, but when I do a test with OCSP Responder, it cannot find the cert serial number in the CRL.
Jim
On Saturday, June 29, 2019, 4:52:20 AM EDT, <oh...@ya...> wrote:
Hi Tomas,
I already had the max_allowed_packet configured on the Mysql server-side (in /etc/my.cnf).
So as I said, when testing with mysql (client) I had to include "--max_allowed_packet=100M" on the mysql (client) command line, e.g.:
mysql -u root -p --max_allowed_packet=100M
If I did NOT include the "--max_allowed_packet=100M" on that command line, then when I did a "select" on the field base64Crl, I would get an error.
I suspect that EJBCA is acting as a Mysql client, so, in order to work with such large CRLs, there needs to be some way to set the equivalent of the "--max_allowed_packet=100M" on the EJBCA side.
How can I do that?
If that can't be done, then I think that when EJBCA tries to retrieve the CRL from the Mysql, it (EJBCA) will see the same error.
Thanks,
Jim
On Saturday, June 29, 2019, 3:25:47 AM EDT, Tomas Gustavsson <to...@pr...> wrote:
You configure max allowed packet size in you MySQL configuration on the
MySQL server.
/Tomas
On 2019-06-29 02:19, o haya via Ejbca-develop wrote:
> I am not 100% sure, but I think I know what might be causing this problem.
>
> I did a test, where I just tried to log into mysql and do the following
> select:
>
> select base64Crl INTO OUTFILE '/var/lib/mysql-files/xx.out' from CRLData
> where cRLNumber=3167;
>
> and I got an error saying that the result was more than max_allowed_packet.
>
> So then I did the same thing, but for the mysql command I used:
>
> mysql -u root -p --max_allowed_packet=100M
>
> and then when I did that same select, I was able to output the entire
> CRL as a PEM.
>
> So, I am theorizing that that is what is happening with EJBCA, i.e.,
> when I run the "openssl ocsp" command, EJBCA is querying the base64CRL
> but the result is too large and so that is causing the query to fail.
>
> So the question now is: How can I cause EJBCA OCSP Responder to run
> with a larger max_allowed_packet so that the query succeeds (and then
> hopefully EJBCA OCSP Responder will be able to check the revocation
> properly)?
>
> Does anyone know how that can be done?
>
> Thanks,
> Jim
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Friday, June 28, 2019, 07:16:39 PM UTC, o haya <oh...@ya...> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> As discussed in an earlier thread, it looks like I was able to import a
> large (> 71MB) CRL file into EJBCA (as an OCSP Responder), so now, I am
> doing testing, using "openssl ocsp" to send requests into the EJBCA OCSP
> Responder:
>
> openssl ocsp -issuer <CA_CERT> -VAfile <SIGNING_CERT> -req_text -serial
> 0x<CERT_SERIAL> -host <HOST:PORT>
>
> But it looks like no matter what serial number I use, whether the serial
> number is in the CRL or not, returns a response like:
>
> OCSP Request Data:
> Version: 1 (0x0)
> Requestor List:
> Certificate ID:
> Hash Algorithm: sha1
> Issuer Name Hash: 37...00
> Issuer Key Hash: 39...E4
> Serial Number: 2FFFF9
> Request Extensions:
> OCSP Nonce:
> 041078B1311984A110B5E19C8DC4895F485B
> Response verify OK
> 0x2FFFF9: unknown
> This Update: Jun 28 18:56:20 2019 GMT
>
> i.e., it looks like the EJBCA OCSP Responder is not able to actually
> find any revoked certs in the CRL?
>
>
> FYI, I *KNOW* that the EJBCA OCSP Responder is functioning properly, in
> general, because I can do the same test against a smaller CRL in the
> same EJBCA OCSP Responder, for CA simpleca, and I can get an actual
> "Revoked" response:
>
> [root@ejbca testocspresponder]# openssl ocsp -issuer simpleca.crt
> -VAfile simplecabinding2.crt -serial 0x008486394c03e1f5d9 -req_text
> -host 192.168.0.28:80
> OCSP Request Data:
> Version: 1 (0x0)
> Requestor List:
> Certificate ID:
> Hash Algorithm: sha1
> Issuer Name Hash: 0C16107310427EA4ADB3C6436915CE44A15FFE55
> Issuer Key Hash: E2533BF85F8C7CA60A411BF5458B2DC3B5232B6E
> Serial Number: 8486394C03E1F5D9
> Request Extensions:
> OCSP Nonce:
> 04109A09CC1C56D26AA73CB4C3FB1EC7CF1F
> Response verify OK
> 0x008486394c03e1f5d9: revoked
> This Update: Jun 28 19:12:48 2019 GMT
> Reason: unspecified
> Revocation Time: May 26 12:30:44 2019 GMT
>
> So it seems like the EJBCA OCSP Responder is either not processing the
> large CRL properly, or maybe the import didn't import the large CRL into
> the OCSP Responder correctly.
>
> Can anyone tell me how do I diagnose this problem?
>
> Thanks,
> Jim
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ejbca-develop mailing list
> Ejb...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ejbca-develop
>
_______________________________________________
Ejbca-develop mailing list
Ejb...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ejbca-develop
|