[Eiffel-emacs-users] Syntax table

[Colin A. <col...@ho...>]

>>>>>"Colin" == Colin Adams <CA...@ax...> writes:

    >> Why? I found it quite useful to C-left or C-right over a
    >> feature name.

    Colin> But that's my point, you can't, because underscore is a
    Colin> separator, not a word character.

Berend> I mean, I actually want to go to the next unit of a feature name, so 
I like the current behaviour :-)

Berend> So you want an option to make an underscore part of the definition 
of a word.

No, I want that to be the default behaviour, because that is the syntax of 
Eiffel.

So by all means add an option, but change the default behaviour.

    Colin> What is the paragraph unit - is it a routine or a feature
    Colin> clause?

    >> Nope, it's just the next blank line, I think this is inherited
    Colin> behaviour, there's no code to change this.

    Colin> I'm sure there is - I remember that some programming modes
    Colin> do indeed change the definition of a paragraph.

Berend> That's true, I meant that the eiffel.el mode doesn't change it.

Well, I think it ought to define a single feature as the paragraph unit.

_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™ Messenger has arrived. Click here to download it for free! 
http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/?locale=en-gb