eclipsepowered-discussion Mailing List for Eclipse Powered
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
eburnette
Menu
▾
▴
eclipsepowered-discussion
This list is closed, nobody may subscribe to it.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(11) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(23) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(61) |
Feb
(51) |
Mar
(50) |
Apr
(38) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(46) |
Jul
(47) |
Aug
(60) |
Sep
(22) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(20) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2006 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Christopher L M. <ch...@we...> - 2006-02-01 21:03:28
|
Claude, I don't know if you've already solved your problem, but I just wrote up our solution for it: http://www.eclipsezone.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=91987331 Chris Claude Montpetit wrote: > Has anyone succeeded in adding another web app to the tomcat server that > installs with the help support in a RCP app? > > To your knowledge, has the tomact plugin been fudged to not allow this? > > I need a service to be present as a web app within my RCP app. Using the > tomcat instance that is there would be just great. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chris Merrill | http://www.webperformance.com Web Performance Inc. Website Load Testing and Stress Testing Software ------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
From: Ed B. <Ed....@sa...> - 2006-01-19 17:05:46
|
I started getting complaints about permalinks for my old articles being = broken so after a nice discussion with Rick and Matt at JL, I just put = things back the way they were. In other words, eclipsepowered.org will = be pointing to EclipseZone.com again. Sorry for any inconvenience. As far as my writing goes, I may try blogspot, and I've been welcomed to = post some at EclipseZone too. However right now I'm pretty busy with = other things. Thanks for your support, --Ed P.S.: If you have any questions or concerns regarding EclipseZone please = send them to ed...@ec... . > -----Original Message----- > From: ecl...@li...=20 > On Behalf Of Ed Burnette > Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 9:49 AM > Subject: [eclipsepowered-discussion] FYI - eclipsepowered.org is back >=20 > FYI, I've revived the eclipsepowered.org site and will be=20 > writing my personal blog there. >=20 > See:=20 > http://www.eclipsepowered.org/2006/01/11/im-back-on-eclipsepowered/ >=20 > My personal email address is ed....@gm... . However=20 > I currently have it set up to forward to my other addresses=20 > so don't worry about sending something to the wrong one. The=20 > nice thing about gmail is that I can get zip files, and it=20 > has an almost unlimited quota. >=20 > Thanks for your support, > --Ed >=20 |
|
From: Ed B. <Ed....@sa...> - 2006-01-11 14:49:48
|
FYI, I've revived the eclipsepowered.org site and will be writing my = personal blog there. See: http://www.eclipsepowered.org/2006/01/11/im-back-on-eclipsepowered/ My personal email address is ed....@gm... . However I currently = have it set up to forward to my other addresses so don't worry about = sending something to the wrong one. The nice thing about gmail is that I = can get zip files, and it has an almost unlimited quota. Thanks for your support, --Ed |
|
From: Ed B. <Ed....@sa...> - 2005-08-31 20:48:45
|
If you went to EclipseWorld I'd love to have you do a write-up for = EclipseZone.com, just write up your observations and post them on the = front page. If you need any help editing it let me know. --Ed |
|
From: Ed B. <ed....@gm...> - 2005-08-10 01:42:34
|
Wow, it's been a busy few months! Let's get to it... 1. RCP Tutorial Part 1 updated A lot has changed since the RCP Tutorials were first written. New wizards, new support for products configurations, branding, and so on. So, I decided the tutorials needed a face lift. When I got into it, it turned out to be more of a rewrite. But finally the first installment is available at: http://www.eclipse.org/articles/Article-RCP-1/tutorial1.html I hope you like it. I'm working on the second part now but it's going to be a while because I have a lot on my plate. 2. Eclipse IDE Pocket Guide O'Reilly will be publishing my new book, the Eclipse IDE Pocket Guide, in the next month or so. This is a small format, 120 page book intended to introduce people to Eclipse as a Java IDE. It's been fun to work on (well, except for the crunch at the end :) ) and I want to thank everyone for their support, especially my reviewers. For more information on the book see: http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/eclipsepg/ I see they've put a sample chapter online: Tips and Tricks. That's one of my favorites because it has something for both new and experienced Eclipse users. Enjoy! 3. JDJ article The Eclipse Foundation contacts me and says they need an article for the JDJ magazine. Oh, and by the way, they need it in a week. What do I do? Turn to you for help of course. Using a wiki site and lots of help from eclipsepowered readers the article was done in record time. Thanks! Here's the link to the finished article: http://java.sys-con.com/read/99729_1.htm This was a very interesting way to write an article. While I wouldn't want to do one on such a tight deadline again, I think the method of using a wiki with community input has proved itself and I would use it again. 4. New site I've saved the best for last. As you probably know by now, the eclipsepowered.org web site has been redirected to a new site called EclipseZone (http://www.eclipsezone.com). I've joined forces with Rick Ross and Matt Schmidt at Javalobby to make Eclipsepowered/EclipseZone even better that before. One change you'll notice right away is that anyone, this includes you, can make posts on the site. Don't worry, I'll still be making the same posts about RCP and Eclipse developments that I always have, but now other Eclipse users and developers will be adding their expertise and opinions to the mix as well. For example, Eclipse Technical Director Bjorn Freeman-Benson posted a note announcing his new feed for Eclipse Committter newsletters: http://www.eclipsezone.com/java/forums/t33006.html Jim des Rivieres posted about the draft Eclipse Platform 3.2 plan: http://www.eclipsezone.com/java/forums/t22361.html Gary Horen used it to announce the new alpha release of APT: http://www.eclipsezone.com/java/forums/t33010.html If that weren't enough, the new site supports multiple forums, with threading, user preferences, and email notifications. Besides the Front Page current discussions, we have an Announcements forum (for product releases, etc.) and a Tips & Tricks forum. For example R.J. Lorimer posted a nice tip about removing clutter by compressing package names in the Package Explorer view: http://www.eclipsezone.com/java/forums/t21366.html This content you won't find anywhere else, and it's all possible through the collaboration with Javalobby. All these new features and the software and hardware that back them up do come at a cost, however. To keep the content free it was necessary to go to an ad-sponsored format. Through the magic of URL rewriting, the permalinks from the original site will continue to work. For example, these all go to the same place: http://www.eclipsepowered.org/archives/2005/07/26/embed-firefox-in-eclipse/ http://www.eclipsezone.com/archives/2005/07/26/embed-firefox-in-eclipse/ http://www.eclipsezone.com/java/forums/t20930.html Going forward we'll be using the latter format. Also the old RSS feed address still works. These go to the same place: http://www.eclipsepowered.org/feed http://www.eclipsezone.com/feed http://www.eclipsezone.com/forumRSS/18110.xml In that last link, the number is the forum number. You can subscribe to any of the forums via RSS, either the full feed or just the popular threads, like this: http://www.eclipsezone.com/rss/rsspopularthreads.jspa?forumID=3D18110 There's a lot more planned for the site, including exclusive interviews, articles, and ties to other community resources. I hope to see you all there. --Ed --=20 home: ed....@gm... work: ed....@sa... web: www.eclipsezone.com |
|
From: Frank G. <fg...@fr...> - 2005-06-19 20:24:19
|
Ed's recent blog post mentioned his FileOpen plug-in. Cool, something like emacsclient for Eclipse :-) I tried it in RC3 but could not get it to work, except for the C-o keybinding. Dragging to the title or menu bar doesn't work for me and opening files via the eclipseclient.jar launcher neither (connection refused, no firewall...). I just want to ask if anyone else is experiencing the same? Frank. |
|
From: Philippe O. <pom...@ne...> - 2005-05-28 01:00:19
|
And a mistake in which I did participate somehow: WTP does not support XQuery per se. No code, nothing, zarro. Not in releases, not in CVS. Just a note that it is in the roadmap, and it shows in the download page for WTP1.0M4 At best it would be able to edit XQueryX in XML syntax which is not much used AFAIK. So to avoid misleading folks I would remove mention of Xquery for now. --=20 Cheers Philippe philippe ombredanne | nexB - Open by Design (tm) 1 650 799 0949 | pombredanne at nexb.com=20 http://www.nexb.com > -----Original Message----- > From: ecl...@li...=20 > [mailto:ecl...@li...] > On Behalf Of Ed Burnette > Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 9:09 PM > To: ecl...@li... > Subject: [eclipsepowered-discussion] Latest JDJ article draft=20 > on Eclipse 3.1 >=20 >=20 > This one has screenshots and some edited text and=20 > corrections. If you spot any errors in it let me know. >=20 > Temporary location: > =20 > http://www.eclipsepowered.org/files/articles/JDJ2005/JDJ2005_ed04.html >=20 > Thanks, > --Ed >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes > Want to be the first software developer in space? > Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt12&alloc_id=16344&op=3Dick > _______________________________________________ > eclipsepowered-discussion mailing list > ecl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipsepowered-discussion >=20 >=20 >=20 |
|
From: Ed B. <Ed....@sa...> - 2005-05-27 23:55:14
|
I reported the Ant problem, the blurry figure problem, and a few other = problems I found (such as a leftover reference to "Figure 12"). Also = sent a picture for the head shot = (http://www.eclipsepowered.org/files/articles/JDJ2005/Burnette_Ed-small.j= pg). According to Darin Swanson, 3.1 will likely ship with Ant 1.6.5 (see = https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96314) but to be safe I = just took the reference to the number out.=20 Thanks, --Ed > -----Original Message----- > From: Philippe Ombredanne > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 10:05 PM >=20 > Ed, I hope that it's NOT the print proof : the quality of the=20 > images is very bad in the PDF. >=20 > The latest version of Ant is now 1.6.4...(was released last week > http://ant.apache.org/) and that that release was committed to HEAD > pretty much the same day by Darin. So 1.6.4 it is and should be in 3.1 > final as after verif in the map files, it was in the last=20 > nightly build, > . |
|
From: Philippe O. <pom...@ne...> - 2005-05-27 22:49:50
|
It still refers to Ant 1.6.3 . Should be 1.6.4 --=20 Cheers Philippe philippe ombredanne | nexB - Open by Design (tm) 1 650 799 0949 | pombredanne at nexb.com=20 http://www.nexb.com > -----Original Message----- > From: ecl...@li...=20 > [mailto:ecl...@li...] > On Behalf Of Ed Burnette > Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 9:09 PM > To: ecl...@li... > Subject: [eclipsepowered-discussion] Latest JDJ article draft=20 > on Eclipse 3.1 >=20 >=20 > This one has screenshots and some edited text and=20 > corrections. If you spot any errors in it let me know. >=20 > Temporary location: > =20 > http://www.eclipsepowered.org/files/articles/JDJ2005/JDJ2005_ed04.html >=20 > Thanks, > --Ed >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes > Want to be the first software developer in space? > Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt12&alloc_id=16344&op=3Dick > _______________________________________________ > eclipsepowered-discussion mailing list > ecl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipsepowered-discussion >=20 >=20 >=20 |
|
From: Philippe O. <pom...@ne...> - 2005-05-27 02:05:28
|
Ed, I hope that it's NOT the print proof : the quality of the images is very bad in the PDF. The latest version of Ant is now 1.6.4...(was released last week http://ant.apache.org/) and that that release was committed to HEAD pretty much the same day by Darin. So 1.6.4 it is and should be in 3.1 final as after verif in the map files, it was in the last nightly build, . --=20 Cheers Philippe philippe ombredanne | nexB - Open by Design (tm) 1 650 799 0949 | pombredanne at nexb.com=20 http://www.nexb.com > -----Original Message----- > From: ecl...@li...=20 > [mailto:ecl...@li...] > On Behalf Of Ed Burnette > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 6:42 PM > To: ecl...@li... > Subject: [eclipsepowered-discussion] RE: Latest JDJ article=20 > draft on Eclipse 3.1 >=20 >=20 > The JDJ editors returned this version: >=20 > http://www.eclipsepowered.org/files/articles/JDJ2005/JDJ_10-6_ Burnette-Eclipse.pdf (temporary location) Unfortunately they cut half of the screenshots. If you spot any errors let me know by mid-day Friday. I already found one - it says Eclipse 3.1 ships with Ant 1.6.3 when in fact it will ship with 1.6.4 or 1.6.5. Thanks, --Ed ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo. Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo! Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own Applications - visit = http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=3Dfad-ysdn-ostg-q22005 _______________________________________________ eclipsepowered-discussion mailing list ecl...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipsepowered-discussion |
|
From: Ed B. <Ed....@sa...> - 2005-05-27 01:42:05
|
The JDJ editors returned this version: http://www.eclipsepowered.org/files/articles/JDJ2005/JDJ_10-6_Burnette-Ec= lipse.pdf (temporary location) Unfortunately they cut half of the screenshots. If you spot any errors = let me know by mid-day Friday. I already found one - it says Eclipse 3.1 = ships with Ant 1.6.3 when in fact it will ship with 1.6.4 or 1.6.5. Thanks, --Ed |
|
From: Philippe O. <pom...@ne...> - 2005-05-22 05:38:13
|
Sounds like it is clean as a baby, and nicely written! I checked the spelling in Word and OO 2.0.=20 I tried using Eclipse's new spell checker for text files, but its is missing a dictionary. in 31M7 :-( --=20 Cheers Philippe philippe ombredanne | nexB - Open by Design (tm) 1 650 799 0949 | pombredanne at nexb.com=20 http://www.nexb.com > -----Original Message----- > From: ecl...@li...=20 > [mailto:ecl...@li...] > On Behalf Of Ed Burnette > Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 9:09 PM > To: ecl...@li... > Subject: [eclipsepowered-discussion] Latest JDJ article draft=20 > on Eclipse 3.1 >=20 >=20 > This one has screenshots and some edited text and=20 > corrections. If you spot any errors in it let me know. >=20 > Temporary location: > =20 > http://www.eclipsepowered.org/files/articles/JDJ2005/JDJ2005_ed04.html >=20 > Thanks, > --Ed >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes > Want to be the first software developer in space? > Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt12&alloc_id=16344&op=3Dick > _______________________________________________ > eclipsepowered-discussion mailing list > ecl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipsepowered-discussion >=20 >=20 >=20 |
|
From: Ed B. <Ed....@sa...> - 2005-05-22 04:08:49
|
This one has screenshots and some edited text and corrections. If you = spot any errors in it let me know. Temporary location: = http://www.eclipsepowered.org/files/articles/JDJ2005/JDJ2005_ed04.html Thanks, --Ed |
|
From: Philippe O. <pom...@ne...> - 2005-05-17 16:43:15
|
That would be interesting to post on the wiki the jdj copy-edited version whenever you have it. --=20 Cheers Philippe philippe ombredanne | nexB - Open by Design (tm) 1 650 799 0949 | pombredanne at nexb.com=20 http://www.nexb.com > -----Original Message----- > From: ecl...@li...=20 > [mailto:ecl...@li...] > On Behalf Of Ed Burnette > Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 7:17 PM > To: ecl...@li... > Subject: [eclipsepowered-discussion] Thanks! >=20 >=20 > I've put the finishing touches on the JDJ article and sent it=20 > off for the editors to look at. Thanks for all your help! >=20 > http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/JDJ2005Toc >=20 > BTW, if you know who these people are please let me know:=20 > mgallego, lmandel, and nobodaddy. > Also if I left somebody off the credits paragraph let me know=20 > that too. >=20 > Thanks, > --Ed >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes > Want to be the first software developer in space? > Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ids93&alloc_id=16281&op=3Dick > _______________________________________________ > eclipsepowered-discussion mailing list > ecl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipsepowered-discussion >=20 >=20 >=20 |
|
From: Ed B. <Ed....@sa...> - 2005-05-16 02:17:32
|
I've put the finishing touches on the JDJ article and sent it off for = the editors to look at. Thanks for all your help! http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/JDJ2005Toc BTW, if you know who these people are please let me know: mgallego, = lmandel, and nobodaddy. Also if I left somebody off the credits paragraph let me know that too. Thanks, --Ed |
|
From: Ed B. <Ed....@sa...> - 2005-05-14 04:59:15
|
Based on comments I've redesigned and redone a lot of the Eclipse 3.1 = article. I think it's pretty close to being done. Hope you like it: http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/JDJ2005Toc --Ed |
|
From: Chris <sc...@sc...> - 2005-05-13 13:01:39
|
I think the article is aimed at both regular developers and plugin/RCP developers. Much of the 3.1 release was aimed at RCP development that I think it makes sense to target much of the article towards that.=20 Also, I think SWT is a very talked-about subject. So I think it = warrants some discussion IMO. -Chris -----Original Message----- From: ecl...@li... [mailto:ecl...@li...] On Behalf = Of Philippe Ombredanne Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 9:01 PM To: ecl...@li... Subject: [eclipsepowered-discussion] JDJ2005 Just a silly question: I was reviewing some of the article stuffs on SWt, and I wonder.... Who is the target reader? Is he or she a Java developer USING the ide to develop his/her own (mostly server side) java apps? Or are he or she an Eclipse plug-ins developer? I tend to believe that it is the former rather than the later... Which would mean that they would not care much about all the nice behind the scenes stuffs that plug-ins developers care much about but means nothing to them. GC in SWT,=20 Just food for thoughts to make sure the article is interesting for a larger audience... --=20 Cheers Philippe philippe ombredanne | nexB - Open by Design (tm) 1 650 799 0949 | pombredanne at nexb.com=20 http://www.nexb.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ids93&alloc_id=16281&op=3Dick _______________________________________________ eclipsepowered-discussion mailing list ecl...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipsepowered-discussion |
|
From: Philippe O. <pom...@ne...> - 2005-05-13 01:00:42
|
Just a silly question: I was reviewing some of the article stuffs on SWt, and I wonder.... Who is the target reader? Is he or she a Java developer USING the ide to develop his/her own (mostly server side) java apps? Or are he or she an Eclipse plug-ins developer? I tend to believe that it is the former rather than the later... Which would mean that they would not care much about all the nice behind the scenes stuffs that plug-ins developers care much about but means nothing to them. GC in SWT,=20 Just food for thoughts to make sure the article is interesting for a larger audience... --=20 Cheers Philippe philippe ombredanne | nexB - Open by Design (tm) 1 650 799 0949 | pombredanne at nexb.com=20 http://www.nexb.com |
|
From: Philippe O. <pom...@ne...> - 2005-05-11 23:39:09
|
And I just redrafted it. It is just a few lines that could be included anywhere where we talk about Java. =20 =20 -- Cheers Philippe philippe ombredanne | nexB - Open by Design (tm) 1 650 799 0949 | pombredanne at nexb.com http://www.nexb.com <http://www.nexb.com/> =20 -----Original Message----- From: ecl...@li... [mailto:ecl...@li...] On Behalf Of Chris Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 4:05 PM To: ecl...@li... Subject: Re: [eclipsepowered-discussion] JDJ article I think its certainly of interest to most, but probably not enough to warrant a whole section related to it. =20 =20 I suspect that we will get more than enough words. Just finishing up the unfinished sections will probably put us well within the target. 350 more words come pretty quickly. =20 I noticed you put markers for screenshots. I'll generate those later tonight or tomorrow. Are you sure JDJ will want to use so many though? I'd figure they'd only want a few screenshots for an article. We probably have place holders for 10 or more. =20 -Chris ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Ed <mailto:Ed....@sa...> Burnette=20 To: ecl...@li...=20 Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 2:03 PM Subject: RE: [eclipsepowered-discussion] JDJ article Great, thanks. The article is up to about 2150 words now (target is 2500-3000, http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/JDJ2005). =20 I'm not sure the Ant section should really be there, what do you think? 3.1 has an Ant debugger and some editor improvements but will that be of interest to the average JDJ reader? I moved it to the attic and didn't count it in the word count for now. _____ =20 From: Chris Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 1:06 PM I've made some updates to the wiki. I added the SWT changes, a description of the BIRT project, and a small paragraph about the preference changes. Hopefully we're on track for the 15th. It looks like the major work is in the JDT section and the Ant section. =20 -Chris |
|
From: Chris <sc...@sc...> - 2005-05-11 23:02:50
|
I think its certainly of interest to most, but probably not enough to = warrant a whole section related to it. =20 I suspect that we will get more than enough words. Just finishing up = the unfinished sections will probably put us well within the target. = 350 more words come pretty quickly. I noticed you put markers for screenshots. I'll generate those later = tonight or tomorrow. Are you sure JDJ will want to use so many though? = I'd figure they'd only want a few screenshots for an article. We = probably have place holders for 10 or more. -Chris ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Ed Burnette=20 To: ecl...@li...=20 Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 2:03 PM Subject: RE: [eclipsepowered-discussion] JDJ article Great, thanks. The article is up to about 2150 words now (target is = 2500-3000, http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/JDJ2005). I'm not sure the Ant section should really be there, what do you = think? 3.1 has an Ant debugger and some editor improvements but will = that be of interest to the average JDJ reader? I moved it to the attic = and didn't count it in the word count for now. -------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- From: Chris Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 1:06 PM I've made some updates to the wiki. I added the SWT changes, a = description of the BIRT project, and a small paragraph about the = preference changes. Hopefully we're on track for the 15th. It looks = like the major work is in the JDT section and the Ant section. -Chris |
|
From: Ed B. <Ed....@sa...> - 2005-05-11 18:04:08
|
Great, thanks. The article is up to about 2150 words now (target is = 2500-3000, http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/JDJ2005). =20 I'm not sure the Ant section should really be there, what do you think? = 3.1 has an Ant debugger and some editor improvements but will that be of = interest to the average JDJ reader? I moved it to the attic and didn't = count it in the word count for now. ________________________________ From: Chris Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 1:06 PM =09 I've made some updates to the wiki. I added the SWT changes, a = description of the BIRT project, and a small paragraph about the = preference changes. Hopefully we're on track for the 15th. It looks = like the major work is in the JDT section and the Ant section. =20 -Chris |
|
From: Chris <sc...@sc...> - 2005-05-11 17:04:51
|
I've made some updates to the wiki. I added the SWT changes, a = description of the BIRT project, and a small paragraph about the = preference changes. Hopefully we're on track for the 15th. It looks = like the major work is in the JDT section and the Ant section. -Chris |
|
From: Ed B. <Ed....@sa...> - 2005-05-09 15:04:30
|
I've integrated Jeff's comments about Web Tools and organized things a = little. Also I added the Eclipse themes to the introduction section; I = think they kind of tie everything together. The latest can be found at: http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/JDJ2005 If we can just get a list of the things we want to cover that would be a = good start. I went through all the New and Noteworthy pages for the 3.1 = milestones and added a few things but there are probably some I missed. = I posted a note on eclipse.foundation and eclipse.platform to try and = encourage some more participation. |
|
From: Ed B. <Ed....@sa...> - 2005-05-05 15:22:07
|
Sure, feel free to add new table of contents entries. The one there is = just a starting point. I just noticed that when you make a change there's a little comment = field at the bottom of the form (near the Save button). If everybody = uses that it might help. > -----Original Message----- > From: ecl...@li...=20 > [mailto:ecl...@li...] > On Behalf Of Chris > Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 10:54 AM > To: ecl...@li... > Subject: RE: [eclipsepowered-discussion] JDJ article group-think >=20 > Hi Ed, >=20 > I'd be happy to do a what's new in SWT overview. I noticed=20 > you don't really > have a place in your table of contents for an overview of SWT changes. > Would you still be interested in that? >=20 > Regards, > -Chris Gross >=20 |
|
From: Chris <sc...@sc...> - 2005-05-05 14:54:05
|
Hi Ed, I'd be happy to do a what's new in SWT overview. I noticed you don't really have a place in your table of contents for an overview of SWT changes. Would you still be interested in that? Regards, -Chris Gross -----Original Message----- From: ecl...@li... [mailto:ecl...@li...] On Behalf Of Ed Burnette Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 11:34 PM To: ecl...@li... Subject: [eclipsepowered-discussion] JDJ article group-think Ian Skerett dropped me a note today saying that we have an opportunity to place an Eclipse 3.1 overview article in the June issue of JDJ. The catch is that the article has to be done in about a week (!) and it needs to be 2500-3000 words long. Impossible? Not if we write it as a group. I've created a wiki page for the article[1]. Log on and start describing your favorite features. Comment on or fix content. Include screen shots. Sign your name. Go wild, everything is versioned (but make backups just in case; this is the first time I've tried this :)). I'll edit. Join the eclipsepowered.org collective. Resistance is futile. Discussion can be here or at eclipsepowered.org[2]. The deadline is May 15th. [1] http://eclipsewiki.editme.com/JDJ2005 [2] http://www.eclipsepowered.org/archives/2005/05/04/jdj-article-group-think/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r _______________________________________________ eclipsepowered-discussion mailing list ecl...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipsepowered-discussion |
11 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
