RE: [Eclipsedotnet-developers] OSGi for .NET implementation

[<jpp...@gm...>]

No problem. Glad to have you back :-) .


No ground-breaking news here, too. BTW, I'm replying here to all the =
mails
so as not to clutter the mailing list (any more than I cluttered it =
lately,
anyway :-P ).

1) SVN - I've been looking at things (i.e., SF.net vs. Tigris.org) and,
frankly, I'm a tad disappointed with Tigris. The reasons for this are:
- Their site is frankly lacking in important info (the most important =
lack I
noticed is ease to find an e-mail address to send questions)
- I sent 2 e-mails to them questioning whether they had an alternative =
port
to use their SVN repositories, other than port 80 (HTTP), as my =
workplace's
proxy filters out SVN HTTP requests. I received no reply to either of =
them.
And, personally, I like SF.net better :) . So, I'm waiting for SF's SVN
(that should come in February). But that doesn't mean we shouldn't work =
on
the platform until then.

2) OSGi - That was exactly my greatest doubt about OSGi on .NET: "would =
OSGi
be adaptable to the .NET life-style?". Since it apparently would not, I
guess we should start thinking about putting our Core subproject as best =
as
possible (in order to stabilize the API ASAP), and implement some useful
features into it (perhaps some features that OSGi has, but implemented =
from
root by us.
Kunle, since you have taken the greatest in-depth look at the OSGi
internals, would you like to "coordinate" this? Feel free to use the =
SF.net
tasks (use the Tasks tab; I have already inserted some sub-projects into =
it)
to create whichever tasks you see necessary, and I'll put whatever =
little
spare time I have into it.


Regards,
JS


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ecl...@li...=20
> [mailto:ecl...@li...]=20
> On Behalf Of Kunle Odutola
> Sent: ter=E7a-feira, 31 de Janeiro de 2006 11:05
> To: ecl...@li...
> Subject: RE: [Eclipsedotnet-developers] OSGi for .NET implementation
>=20
> > BTW, Kunle, I just remembered this: Physalis is (was) a=20
> project that=20
> > attempted to create an OSGi implementation for the .NET Compact=20
> > Framework. It is located at=20
> > http://developer.berlios.de/projects/physalis/ . According to its=20
> > authors, it's not complete, but it could give some leverage=20
> to get you=20
> > started (if you haven't already).
>=20
> Thanks for the info. I have had a look at Physalis already.=20
> It's a little raw/incomplete but OSGi is too tied to Java IMO.
>=20
> Been a little busy since the year began. Hoping to catch a break soon.
>=20
> Kunle
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep=20
> through log files for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX=20
> search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as=20
> surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D103432&bid=3D230486&
> dat=3D121642
> _______________________________________________
> Eclipsedotnet-developers mailing list
> Ecl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipsedotnet-developers
>=20
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.23/242 - Release=20
> Date: 26-01-2006
> =20
>=20

--=20
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.14.25/246 - Release Date: =
30-01-2006
=20